Skip to content

feat: add Loops migration skill - #38

Draft
chrisfrantz wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
chore/loops-migrate-sandbox
Draft

feat: add Loops migration skill#38
chrisfrantz wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
chore/loops-migrate-sandbox

Conversation

@chrisfrantz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds a complete Loops migration skill that audits an email stack before making changes.
Maps sends, templates, workflows, contacts, pricing, and cleanup into a proposal and verified final report.
Supports Codex inline visuals and Claude inline/Markdown report cards with an explicit migration approval gate.

chrisfrantz and others added 3 commits July 24, 2026 13:38
The presentation rules told Claude Code to render the report as a Markdown
dashboard and explicitly forbade generating an HTML report, so the richer
visual surface was unreachable even when the user asked for it.

Point the Claude Code branch at the artifact-design skill and the Artifact
tool, keeping the Markdown dashboard as the fallback when that tool is
unavailable, and narrow the prohibition to what it needs to protect: no
report file written into the target repository.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@chrisfrantz
chrisfrantz requested a review from danrowden August 2, 2026 13:55

@danrowden danrowden left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Amazing. Just left some thoughts

Supported account setup to detect and report as follow-up:

- sending domain required for content-resource creation
- content API access

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can remove content API and workflow API access, as everyone access

- CC/BCC entitlement
- attachment enablement
- translation enablement
- dedicated IP requirements

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could remove dedicated IP requirements as we don't offer that as an option/feature

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants