Repository navigation
docs: sigma row names the thickness and dose terms - #57
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…n the parity list parity.md: the sigma on wt% and at% row says the per-spectrum quantifyWithSigma takes thicknessSigmaNm (Cliff-Lorimer) and doseRelativeSigma (zeta, cross section), names the four new sigma fields, and gives the coverage the planted-case tests hold (0.63 to 0.71 within 1 sigma, 0.93 to 0.97 within 2 sigma). The open-areas list said Si 8.7 % low; since the absorption-truth test counts the Si internal-fluorescence peak it is 20 % low against the whole planted peak, as the EDS note and open-items already say. open-items.md: item 9 keeps only the detector term and the per-pixel sigma map. The Si internal-fluorescence note and open-items item 3 were already updated by the PR that pinned the bias. The dead-layer row, the take-off-angle and map sigma, and the pile-up sentence of item 8 wait for their PRs to merge. Done: rows for the thickness and dose sigma. Next: the detector and map sigma rows and the dead-layer row when they merge. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Oct 31, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Requested by Paul · project thread
Part of #15
Docs only, for the merged #53 and #52.
docs/parity.md: the sigma on wt% and at% row saysquantifyWithSigmatakesthicknessSigmaNm:(Cliff-Lorimer) anddoseRelativeSigma:(zeta, cross section), names the four new sigma fields, and gives the coverage the planted-case tests hold (0.63 to 0.71 within 1 sigma, 0.93 to 0.97 within 2 sigma). The open-areas list said Si 8.7 % low; since the absorption-truth test counts the Si internal-fluorescence peak it reads 20 % low against the whole planted peak, as the EDS note already says.docs/open-items.md: item 9 keeps only the detector term and the per-pixel sigma map.Already current on main: the Si internal-fluorescence note and open-items item 3 (#52).
Remains: the take-off angle and map sigma (#55), the dead-layer row (#50) and the item 8 pile-up sentence (#56), once those merge.
Test evidence: docs only; the CI gate staying green is the test.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code