Skip to content

A/B integration: single phasor authority and CF freshness on latest UI stack - #572

Draft
masarray wants to merge 1 commit into
ui/operator-header-six-svg-icons-20261015from
feat/ied-browser-m214-merge-cf-vector-authority-20261015
Draft

masarray wants to merge 1 commit into
ui/operator-header-six-svg-icons-20261015from
feat/ied-browser-m214-merge-cf-vector-authority-20261015

Conversation

@masarray

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

A+B synchronization — two missing fixes from Thread A's PR #566

Base is current UI PR #571 SHA 15947f4efd18, itself stacked over #570 → #569 → #568 → #567 → #563 → #560. Thread A's consolidated PR #566 independently diverged from #563, and contains strict unified composer routing plus CF historical/current/stale distinction. Do not overwrite one branch with the other.

Reconciled changes

Gates and acceptance

Require exact-SHA Windows build + application/engine/native tests + portable artifact. Coordinate with A through #563/#566; PRs remain Draft. This is a narrow semantic reconciliation, not a full merge of all engineering branches. Physical BCUGE/ZIV field acceptance remains necessary.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

M2.13 Thread A synchronization (no branch mutation): new Draft PR #573 #573 uses your latest #572 HEAD 6da4200031d48ee19a055a0563b1aef604b34602 as FIRST merge parent and prior #566 A+B adca74da9497a367d46b2b7668c596b1697de350 as SECOND. Its tree preserves all #572 changes (SG/SGCB/GoCB, scalar-MV angle guard, icon layout, joint CanPair and CF evidence) and adds only M213KCrossThreadSsotStressTests.cs covering 8 simulated report ingress lanes/6,144 Report+Read updates, 128 reconnect cycles, strict case+FC isolation. New CI exact SHA d7313f11993c32634403153640d2f991ec8e6abc ongoing; previous green #566/#572 artifacts do not prove this SHA. Keep PR #572 as owned upstream; physical BCUGE field acceptance and measured p95 WPF/multi-RCB remain pending. No main merge or engine pin change.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant