solution#1102
Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Your implementation covers all core requirements well, but there is one issue that needs addressing. The position field has a 5-character minimum validation on lines 120-123 that is not specified in the task requirements. Since the task only requires validation for Name (≥4 chars) and Age (18-90), this extra validation may cause test failures if tests include position values shorter than 5 characters. Please remove lines 120-123. Additionally, there are duplicate noValidate settings on lines 47-48 and 50-51 - remove the first occurrence (lines 47-48) to clean up the redundancy. Once these are addressed, your submission will be ready for approval.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
|
|
||
| form.noValidate = true; | ||
| form.setAttribute('novalidate', ''); | ||
|
|
||
| form.noValidate = true; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Duplicate noValidate = true and setAttribute('novalidate', '') lines. Lines 47-48 are repeated on lines 50-51. Remove the duplicate lines 47-48.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
All core task requirements are implemented and functioning correctly. The form validation properly checks Name (≥4 characters) and Age (18-90) as specified, table sorting toggles between ASC and DESC, row selection works with the 'active' class, and all notifications display appropriately. The only noted issue is a minor redundancy where noValidate is set twice (lines 47-48), but this doesn't affect functionality and falls under code quality preferences rather than a blocking issue. The optional cell editing feature wasn't implemented, which is acceptable per requirements. Your solution is complete and ready.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
No description provided.