solution#890
Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Thank you for your hard work! Your implementation of the splitInteger function is correct and covers all the core requirements. However, there is a critical issue with one of your test cases: the test intended to verify the sorting of non-equal parts currently uses splitInteger(6, 1), which only returns [6] (a single, equal part). This means the sorting requirement is not actually being tested. Please update this test to use input values that produce non-equal parts (for example, splitInteger(7, 3)), so that the sorting behavior is properly verified. Once this is addressed, your solution will fully meet all requirements. Great job so far—you're almost there! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
| const result = splitInteger(6, 1); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(result).toEqual([...result].sort((a, b) => a - b)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: The test uses splitInteger(6, 1), which returns [6], so all parts are equal and the test does not verify the sorting of non-equal parts as described in the test name. Consider using a value and numberOfParts where the result will contain non-equal parts, such as splitInteger(7, 3), to properly test the sorting requirement.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great job! 🎉 Your implementation meets all the core requirements: the function works as expected, the tests are comprehensive and accurate, and your ESLint configuration is correct. There are no critical issues or missing functionalities. Keep up the excellent work!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
No description provided.