Solution#949
Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great job! 🎉 Your implementation of splitInteger meets all the core requirements and passes comprehensive tests. While the use of .sort() is a minor workaround (since distributing the remainder to the first elements would make sorting unnecessary), it does not affect the correctness or functionality of your solution. If you want to further optimize your code, consider distributing the remainder to the first elements directly. Keep up the good work!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
| parts.push(part); | ||
| rest -= part; | ||
| for (let i = 0; i < remainder; i++) { | ||
| result[numberOfParts - 1 - i] += 1; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: The remainder is distributed to the last elements of the array. If the task requires the largest values to be at the beginning, you should distribute the remainder to the first elements instead (i.e., use result[i] += 1).
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return parts; | ||
| return result.sort((a, b) => a - b); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: The use of sort here is a workaround to ensure the largest values are at the beginning after distributing the remainder to the end. If you distribute the remainder to the first elements, sorting would not be necessary.
2 participants
No description provided.