Skip to content

matthewsmawfield/TEP-EXP

Repository files navigation

What Do Precision Tests of General Relativity Actually Measure?

DOI License: CC BY 4.0

TEP-EXP: Precision Tests of General Relativity

Author: Matthew Lukin Smawfield
Version: v0.4 (Istanbul)
Date: First published: 31 December 2025 · Last updated: 4 May 2026
Status: Preprint
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18109760 Website: https://mlsmawfield.com/tep/exp/ Paper Series: TEP Series: Paper 9 (Experimental Foundations)

Abstract

Most high-precision tests of general relativity constrain reciprocity-even, largely local observables within single-metric frameworks. This leaves open a specific underdetermination between General Relativity (GR) and a class of two-metric disformal scalar-tensor modifications, exemplified here by the Temporal Equivalence Principle (TEP).

This paper formalizes a measurement taxonomy distinguishing gauge-invariant from convention-dependent observables and identifies six recurring scope limitations in the experimental canon: (1) two-way measurement dominance; (2) local/global conflation; (3) model-dependent calibration; (4) single-path multi-messenger constraints on differential propagation that do not directly test common-mode clock-sector structure; (5) theory-laden data reduction; and (6) the density-regime screening blind spot, whereby tests performed in deep potential wells probe only the screened regime where scalar-field gradients are continuously suppressed, leaving the unscreened low-density regime unexplored. These characteristics do not diminish the experimental achievements but indicate that, in many cases, the tests primarily constrain parameter space within assumed frameworks rather than systematically discriminating between alternatives.

Discriminating observables—specifically loop asymmetries, spatial correlations, and density-regime screening transitions—are proposed, together with experimental configurations capable of resolving the underdetermination. These include large-area triangle holonomy tests (targeting residual synchronization holonomy H_resid), interplanetary closed-loop timing, altitude-varying optical clock networks to map continuous geometric screening, and matter-wave interferometry.

Key Findings

Precision tests of GR predominantly constrain reciprocity-even, two-way observables and therefore underdetermine disformal two-metric theories that preserve local physics. Six structural blind spots are identified: two-way measurement dominance, local/global conflation, model-dependent calibration, the indirect bounds from multi-messenger constraints, theory-laden data reduction, and the density-regime screening blind spot. The paper proposes discriminating tests that directly target one-way, loop-dependent observables—triangle holonomy, interplanetary closed-loop timing, and continental-scale optical clock networks—providing falsifiable pathways to resolve the GR–TEP underdetermination.

The TEP Research Program

Paper Repository Title DOI
Paper 0 TEP Temporal Equivalence Principle: Dynamic Time & Emergent Light Speed 10.5281/zenodo.16921911
Paper 9 TEP-EXP (This repo) What Do Precision Tests of General Relativity Actually Measure? 10.5281/zenodo.18109760
Paper 1 TEP-GNSS Global Time Echoes: Distance-Structured Correlations in GNSS Clocks 10.5281/zenodo.17127229
Paper 2 TEP-GNSS-II Global Time Echoes: 25-Year Analysis of CODE Precise Clock Products 10.5281/zenodo.17517141
Paper 3 TEP-GNSS-RINEX Global Time Echoes: Raw RINEX Consistency Test 10.5281/zenodo.17860166
Paper 4 TEP-GL Temporal-Spatial Coupling in Gravitational Lensing: A Reinterpretation of Dark Matter Observations 10.5281/zenodo.17982540
Paper 5 TEP-GTE Global Time Echoes: Empirical Synthesis 10.5281/zenodo.18004832
Paper 6 TEP-UCD Universal Critical Density: Cross-Scale Consistency of ρ_T 10.5281/zenodo.18064365
Paper 7 TEP-RBH The Soliton Wake: Exploring RBH-1 as a Temporal Topology Candidate 10.5281/zenodo.18059250
Paper 8 TEP-SLR Global Time Echoes: Optical-Domain Consistency Test via Satellite Laser Ranging 10.5281/zenodo.18064581
Paper 10 TEP-COS Temporal Equivalence Principle: Suppressed Density Scaling in Globular Cluster Pulsars 10.5281/zenodo.18165798
Paper 11 TEP-H0 The Cepheid Bias: Resolving the Hubble Tension 10.5281/zenodo.18209702
Paper 12 TEP-JWST Temporal Equivalence Principle: A Unified Resolution to the JWST High-Redshift Anomalies 10.5281/zenodo.19000827
Paper 13 TEP-WB Temporal Equivalence Principle: Temporal Shear Recovery in Gaia DR3 Wide Binaries 10.5281/zenodo.19102061
Paper 15 TEP-EFA Temporal Equivalence Principle: Temporal Shear in the Earth Flyby Anomaly 10.5281/zenodo.19454863
Paper 16 TEP-J0437 Synchronization Holonomy in Pulsar Scintillation 10.5281/zenodo.19454620
Paper 17 TEP-LLR Lunar Laser Ranging and the Nordtvedt Effect 10.5281/zenodo.19446029

Key Arguments

The Circularity Problem

The engineering success of GPS demonstrates self-consistency within the assumed framework. It does not, by itself, establish uniqueness of that framework among alternatives that reproduce the same local observables after the same class of corrections.

The Two-Way Blindness

Almost all precision tests use two-way (round-trip) measurements. These are mathematically insensitive to reciprocity-odd, direction-dependent effects. A convention-independent residual holonomy H_resid requires one-way, direction-reversing closed loops after subtracting modeled GR loop terms.

The Local/Global Conflation

Local tests (e.g., Pound-Rebka, optical clocks) confirm the Einstein Equivalence Principle to extraordinary precision. Agreement at the local level does not, by itself, fix global synchronization structure.

Single-Path Multi-Messenger Limitations

GW170817-type observations primarily constrain differential propagation speed between photons and gravitons, hence disformal cone tilt. They do not directly constrain common-mode conformal clock-rate structure along a shared path, although conformal scalar sectors remain indirectly constrained by PPN, equivalence-principle, source-screening, and clock-comparison tests.

Experiments Examined

Experiment Claimed Result TEP Critique
Hafele-Keating (1971) Confirms time dilation Two-way; does not probe one-way asymmetry
Pound-Rebka (1960) Gravitational redshift Local; TEP predicts identical local result
GPS "works" Proves GR corrections Self-consistent under assumed model
Cassini (2003) PPN γ = 1 to 10⁻⁵ Two-way Shapiro; blind to odd-parity effects
GW170817 c_γ = c_g to 10⁻¹⁵ Constrains differential propagation; indirect conformal bounds from other tests
Gravity Probe B Frame-dragging Measures geodetic precession; consistent with TEP
Resonator MM/KT tests Isotropy to 10⁻¹⁸ Two-way, closed-path; blind to one-way non-reciprocity

Proposed Discriminating Tests

  1. Triangle Holonomy Tests: One-way timing around large-area direction-reversing loops targeting residual synchronization holonomy H_resid
  2. Interplanetary Closed-Loop Timing: AU-scale, direction-reversed loop measurements constructed from one-way time-tagged links
  3. GNSS Correlation Replication: Independent, blinded analysis of raw GNSS data to verify or refute distance-structured correlations suggested by exploratory analyses
  4. Optical Clock Networks: Continental-scale networks using one-way comparisons to probe synchronization structure
  5. Matter-Wave Interferometry: Loop asymmetries in massive particle phase accumulation

File Structure

TEP-EXP/
├── site/                           # Academic manuscript site
│   ├── components/                 # HTML section files
│   ├── public/                     # Static assets
│   └── figures/                    # Generated plots
├── manuscripts/                    # Related manuscripts (PDF)
├── 9-TEP-EXP-v0.4-Istanbul.md      # Generated manuscript (built from site/components)
└── VERSION.json                    # Version metadata

Building the Site

cd site
npm install
npm run build

The built site will be in site/dist/. The build also regenerates 9-TEP-EXP-v0.4-Istanbul.md at the repository root.

Citation

@misc{smawfield2025exp,
  title        = {What Do Precision Tests of General Relativity Actually Measure?},
  author       = {Smawfield, Matthew Lukin},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.18109760},
  url          = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18109760},
  note         = {Preprint, Version v0.4 (Istanbul)}
}

Open Science Statement

These are working preprints shared in the spirit of open science—all manuscripts, analysis code, and data products are openly available under Creative Commons and MIT licenses to encourage and facilitate replication. Feedback and collaboration are warmly invited and welcome.


Contact: matthew@mlsmawfield.com
ORCID: 0009-0003-8219-3159

About

What Do Precision Tests of General Relativity Actually Measure? A methodological taxonomy showing why most precision tests constrain largely local, reciprocity-even observables within assumed frameworks. Proposes discriminating experiments. TEP Paper 10.

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors