Skip to content

chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.59.4#2700

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo
Open

chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.59.4#2700
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate Bot commented Apr 20, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.58.28.59.4 age confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.58.28.59.4 age confidence
typescript-eslint (source) 8.58.28.59.4 age confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.59.4

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-floating-promises] stack overflow when using recursive types (#​12294)
❤️ Thank You

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.59.3

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for eslint-plugin to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.59.2

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-deprecated] object destructuring values should be treated as declarations (#​12292)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unsafe-type-assertion] handle crash on recursive template literal types (#​12150)
❤️ Thank You

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.59.1

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-condition] treat void as nullish in no-unnecessary-condition (#​12241)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-type-arguments] handle instantiation expressions (#​12220)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] avoid false positive in logical assignment assertions (#​12278)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] preserve phantom type arguments in generic inference (#​12269)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] preserve index signatures in undefined unions (#​12257)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] fix crash "TypeError: checker.getTypeArguments is not a function" (#​12246)
❤️ Thank You

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.59.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] report more cases based on assignability (#​11789)
❤️ Thank You
  • Ulrich Stark

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.59.4

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.59.3

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.59.2

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.59.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.59.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (typescript-eslint)

v8.59.4

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • typescript-eslint: export Compatible* types from typescript-eslint to resolve pnpm TS error (#​12340)
❤️ Thank You

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.59.3

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.59.2

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.59.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.59.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot enabled auto-merge (squash) April 20, 2026 19:52
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 20, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (5ab9902) to head (ecc75f9).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #2700   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           56        56           
  Lines         1866      1866           
  Branches       444       444           
=========================================
  Hits          1866      1866           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from d66f826 to 015a7a1 Compare April 27, 2026 18:36
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.59.0 chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.59.1 Apr 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from a8330b8 to 71a6449 Compare May 4, 2026 18:38
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.59.1 chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.59.2 May 4, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 71a6449 to d8c5d15 Compare May 11, 2026 18:36
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.59.2 chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.59.3 May 11, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch 3 times, most recently from 6de1c14 to 95527a1 Compare May 18, 2026 19:50
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.59.3 chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.59.4 May 18, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 95527a1 to ecc75f9 Compare May 20, 2026 13:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants