Skip to content

document native mobile passkey setup#19

Merged
mdfarhankc merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/passkey-native-mobile
Apr 26, 2026
Merged

document native mobile passkey setup#19
mdfarhankc merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/passkey-native-mobile

Conversation

@mdfarhankc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Adds a Native mobile apps (iOS / Android) section to the skill passkeys reference. The library already handles native-app origin formats via py-webauthn; this is purely documentation for adopters integrating Flutter / React Native / native iOS-Android clients.

Covers:

  • Why public-suffix domains (*.vercel.app, *.netlify.app, *.github.io, *.herokuapp.com) are a poor fit for native-app passkeys and why a custom domain is effectively required before App Store / Play Store release.
  • apple-app-site-association and assetlinks.json setup with working JSON samples.
  • Origin format per platform — iOS piggy-backs on the web origin, Android requires an android:apk-key-hash:<base64url(SHA-256)> entry in PASSKEY_ORIGINS.
  • Flutter client setup (iOS associated-domains entitlement, Android Credential Manager).
  • Common pitfalls: Play App Signing fingerprint vs upload keystore, AASA content-type, RP ID case mismatch, preview deployment URL drift.

No code changes.

Test plan

  • uv run ruff format --check . clean
  • uv run ruff check . clean
  • uv run pytest tests/ — 188 passed, 1 skipped (no code changes, tests unaffected)
  • CI green on this PR

Adds a section to the skill passkeys reference covering iOS + Android
support: the AASA and assetlinks.json association files, the
android:apk-key-hash origin format, Flutter client setup, and common
pitfalls like Play App Signing fingerprint mismatches and AASA
content-type issues. No code changes - the library already supports
these origin formats via py-webauthn.
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 23, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@mdfarhankc has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 36 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 36 minutes and 46 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: bb9570ed-9697-4a68-9759-7fe253cbae4b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3aa9270 and db6ca92.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • fastapi_fullauth/.agents/skills/fastapi-fullauth/references/passkeys.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/passkey-native-mobile

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@mdfarhankc mdfarhankc merged commit de21af7 into main Apr 26, 2026
7 checks passed
@mdfarhankc mdfarhankc deleted the docs/passkey-native-mobile branch April 26, 2026 12:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant