Conversation
github-actions
Bot
added
infra
Contributor
|
Tip: Review these changes grouped by change (recommended for most PRs), or grouped by feature (for large PRs). |
Contributor
Author
|
@Elchi3 Would this be useful for your work on flags data? If not, I would close it. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Add
npm run flag-inventoryto make it easier to inspect flags recorded in BCD.Test results and supporting details
Output counts explicit flag occurrences by type, browser, and name, sorted alphabetically. Mirrored support is excluded.
Both unit tests, ESLint, Prettier, and TypeScript pass. Verified output against the full dataset.
Related issues
Inspired by #30469.