I can see some inconsistency. The "Windows USB Installer" creates USB Flash that contains mt86+ in flavors:
- UEFI x64 (64 bit)
- UEFI x86 (32 bit)
- Legacy BIOS Boot x86 (32bit)
The "Linux ISO w/ GRUB (64 bits)" ISO contains mt86+ UEFI x64 (64 bit) AND mt86+ for Legacy BIOS Boot in x64 (64bit) flavor!
Why not add this mt86+ for Legacy BIOS Boot in 64bit flavor to USB installer as well? That way the USB Installer will create as universal Flash as can be (both, UEFI32 and UEFI64, and also Legacy BIOS 32bit and Legacy BIOS 64bit).
In fact I have tried this (just copy the "\boot\memtest" image from the GRUB flavor ISO, onto the flash drive created via "Windows USB Installer", changed it's name to eg, "mt86_64", and added an appropriate entry in syslinux.cfg to add the image. And it works OK. Both 32 bit and 64 bit flavors of MemTest86plus for Legacy BIOS Boot can be in the same medium, and both of them works.
I can see some inconsistency. The "Windows USB Installer" creates USB Flash that contains mt86+ in flavors:
The "Linux ISO w/ GRUB (64 bits)" ISO contains mt86+ UEFI x64 (64 bit) AND mt86+ for Legacy BIOS Boot in x64 (64bit) flavor!
Why not add this mt86+ for Legacy BIOS Boot in 64bit flavor to USB installer as well? That way the USB Installer will create as universal Flash as can be (both, UEFI32 and UEFI64, and also Legacy BIOS 32bit and Legacy BIOS 64bit).
In fact I have tried this (just copy the "\boot\memtest" image from the GRUB flavor ISO, onto the flash drive created via "Windows USB Installer", changed it's name to eg, "mt86_64", and added an appropriate entry in syslinux.cfg to add the image. And it works OK. Both 32 bit and 64 bit flavors of MemTest86plus for Legacy BIOS Boot can be in the same medium, and both of them works.