Skip to content

ci: run the build on merge_group events - #60

Merged
jamesarich merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci/merge-queue
Oct 3, 2026
Merged

jamesarich merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci/merge-queue

Conversation

@jamesarich

@jamesarich jamesarich commented Oct 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Lets a merge queue run the board builds on the group it is about to merge, so the queue can be turned on for master.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Automated checks now also run for merge queue events. Existing pull request and release triggers remain unchanged. This extends when checks run during change integration; no application features or user-facing behavior have changed.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius.

🧰 Additional context used
📚 Code guidelines (1)
AGENTS.md — auto-discovered

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 48deecd3-35a4-4d93-827e-8a97a48ae449
📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 17f6209 and e6f786e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/githubci.yml

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflow now runs for merge_group events. Existing pull request and release triggers remain unchanged.

Changes

CI triggers

Layer / File(s) Summary
Add merge group trigger
.github/workflows/githubci.yml
The workflow now runs for merge_group events. Existing pull request and release triggers remain unchanged.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Change: Feature

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to e6f78

The workflow runs board builds for merge-group events, and this change shows no code-level blocker to merging.

Architecture Summary

Architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to e6f78

The changed surface does not map to a changed system, dependency edge, entrypoint, or external dependency.

Changed systems: None identified.

Architecture concerns
No architecture-level concerns identified.

Review details

Before / after behavior

  • observed — Modified behavior in .github/workflows/githubci.yml: Added merge_group as a workflow trigger.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main change: running the build for merge_group events.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
  • Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

A rabbit checked the workflow gate,
“Merge groups may join the queue!”
The old triggers still remain,
While CI wakes for one more cue.
I nibble clover, pleased and bright,
Then hop along beneath the moon.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@jamesarich
jamesarich merged commit 9e4a72b into master Oct 3, 2026
23 checks passed
@jamesarich
jamesarich deleted the ci/merge-queue branch October 3, 2026 23:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant