Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
I would say we need to have it for both METS versions since both is still going to be used. Its possible to split up but we wont have a perfect place for the version 1 text. So suggest keeping it together and move the decision on how to split and move around a bit further down the road. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added the version from Google document here, had a second reading.
Main question is whether this is the right place to put it. It could for example also go to https://mets.github.io/ instead of the Guide. But I think that landing page is having enough topics already.
Also, having it in the Guide we can make it more specific for Version 2, while I would have a hard time finding a spot where it is clearly a resource for both versions.