Skip to content

chore: bump michelangelo-examples version to 0.3.0 - #28

Merged
sallycr merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
bump/examples-v0.3.0
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

chore: bump michelangelo-examples version to 0.3.0#28
sallycr merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
bump/examples-v0.3.0

Conversation

@sallycr

@sallycr sallycr commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Test plan

  • CI green
  • Merge, tag v0.3.0 -> triggers release.yml (PyPI) + changelog.yml (GitHub Release, CHANGELOG.md PR)
  • Verify PyPI + GitHub Release

@sallycr
sallycr requested a review from paulzim August 11, 2026 00:44

@paulzim paulzim left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR #28 review: chore: bump michelangelo-examples version to 0.3.0

Verdict: Approve.

Verification

PR #26 (chore: bump michelangelo floor to 0.8.0) confirmed merged to main on 2026-08-10. v0.2.0 is the current latest tag; v0.3.0 does not exist — no tag collision risk.

SemVer assessment

Minor bump (0.2.0 → 0.3.0) is correct. Raising the michelangelo floor from >=0.6.0 to >=0.8.0 tightens the dependency constraint in a way that can require callers to upgrade — that's at minimum a minor bump. Same reasoning as the 0.1.0 → 0.2.0 release (PR #13).

Post-merge checklist (from PR body)

Tag v0.3.0 after merge to trigger release.yml (PyPI) and changelog.yml (GitHub Release + CHANGELOG.md PR). Both workflows were verified working in the 0.2.0 cycle (including the detached-HEAD fix from PR #14), so no concerns there.

@sallycr
sallycr merged commit 0838ffb into main Aug 11, 2026
3 checks passed
@sallycr
sallycr deleted the bump/examples-v0.3.0 branch August 11, 2026 02:33
paulzim added a commit to paulzim/michelangelo-examples that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
pyproject.toml was bumped to 0.3.0 in michelangelo-ai#28 but the lockfile's own
editable-package entry was left stale at 0.2.0 -- caught by a Mac-side
`uv sync` showing an unexpected uv.lock diff.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants