Resolve conditions against the current row in repeated layouts

[craigmarker]

Summary

A condition's target field is an entity-relative path, so reusing the same condition config across every row of a repeated layout would otherwise only ever subscribe to the first row's field. Resolving the target against the current row requires splicing that row's index into the right spot in the path, so this adds that path-building step as its own tested helper and wires it directly into the condition renderer.

Test Plan

I ran the path-building helper's tests (index insertion, an exact-match root path, multiple existing indices in a nested repeated root, index 0) along with the condition renderer's tests covering: resolving against the indexed field for the current row, not matching against a different row's index in the same list, and reacting to changes at the indexed field rather than the unindexed entity path.

I also verified the fix interactively in the sandbox by adding a repeated-layout example whose condition depends on a field in the same row. With two rows rendered, checking the first row's "Show detail" box only revealed that row's detail field, and unchecking it removed it while the second row's own (independently checked) detail field and value stayed exactly as they were. The rendered field names confirmed each row's condition and target resolved against its own index (items[0].detail and items[1].detail), and submitting the form showed each row's values were tracked independently.

[github-actions]

JavaScript Coverage Report

Total Coverage: 92.86%

Coverage Policy:

• Baseline (existing code): ≥78.74% (current coverage)
• New/changed code: ≥90% ✅ STRICTLY ENFORCED

Coverage Details

$(cat coverage/coverage-summary.json 2>/dev/null | node -p "const c=require('fs').readFileSync(0,'utf8'); JSON.stringify(JSON.parse(c).total, null, 2)" || echo "Coverage summary not available")

View detailed HTML report in artifacts

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!