Repository navigation
Conversation
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
Owner
Author
Lokay Check 1SHA: Wynik: pending · CI: pending · tests: pending · tested=false Uwagi i CI: {
"uwagi": [],
"notes": [],
"failed": [],
"pending": [
"test (3.12)",
"test (3.13)"
]
} |
Owner
Author
Lokay Check 1SHA: Wynik: fix · CI: green · tests: green · tested=true
Uwagi i CI: {
"uwagi": [
{
"plik": "tests/test_fleet.py",
"linia_od": 70,
"linia_do": 70,
"zmiana": "Removes 2 test assertions: tests/test_fleet.py",
"pytanie": "weakened_tests"
}
],
"notes": [],
"failed": [],
"pending": []
} |
Owner
Author
Lokay Check 2SHA: Wynik: pending · CI: pending · tests: pending · tested=false Uwagi i CI: {
"uwagi": [],
"notes": [],
"failed": [],
"pending": [
"test (3.12)"
]
} |
Owner
Author
Lokay Check 2SHA: Wynik: fix · CI: green · tests: green · tested=true
Uwagi i CI: {
"uwagi": [
{
"plik": "README.md",
"linia_od": 88,
"linia_do": 492,
"pytanie": "alignment",
"p": 0.98,
"uzasadnienie": "Issue #89 explicitly requests host/ops evidence, auto-unparking upon receipt or Hermes restoration, and keeping the parent skipped without limbo or needs_human until then. It explicitly excludes a coding slot. These README lifecycle edits and corresponding test changes do not implement or document those requested operational outcomes, and no CI failure requiring them is shown.\nREADME.md:88 onward rewrites spawn/stop lifecycle documentation and relocates launch-persistence and termination-authority details. That concerns the library's process API, not the requested host evidence receipt, Hermes restoration, or parent skip/unpark handling. This is concrete scope drift from an explicitly non-coding issue."
},
{
"plik": "tests/test_fleet.py",
"linia_od": 67,
"linia_do": 379,
"pytanie": "alignment",
"p": 0.96,
"uzasadnienie": "Issue #89 explicitly requests host/ops evidence, auto-unparking upon receipt or Hermes restoration, and keeping the parent skipped without limbo or needs_human until then. It explicitly excludes a coding slot. These README lifecycle edits and corresponding test changes do not implement or document those requested operational outcomes, and no CI failure requiring them is shown.\ntests/test_fleet.py:67 onward changes documentation-contract assertions to match the unrelated process-lifecycle README rewrite. These checks do not address evidence-triggered unparking or parent skip state, and there is no demonstrated pre-existing CI failure necessitating the change. This is a scope concern, not a renewed claim that the previously addressed assertion removal weakened tests."
},
{
"plik": "README.md",
"linia_od": 88,
"linia_do": 492,
"pytanie": "scope",
"p": 0.98,
"uzasadnienie": "Issue #89 explicitly requests host/ops evidence handling, auto-unparking, and keeping the parent skipped pending evidence—not coding changes. The diff instead revises process-lifecycle documentation and its contract tests, with no demonstrated connection to those requirements or a necessary CI fix.\nREADME.md:88 onward rewrites the spawn/stop lifecycle descriptions and relocates their guarantees to a fail-closed lifecycle section. This documentation restructuring is unrelated to obtaining host evidence, restoring Hermes, auto-unparking, or maintaining the parent's skip state."
},
{
"plik": "tests/test_fleet.py",
"linia_od": 67,
"linia_do": 379,
"pytanie": "scope",
"p": 0.96,
"uzasadnienie": "Issue #89 explicitly requests host/ops evidence handling, auto-unparking, and keeping the parent skipped pending evidence—not coding changes. The diff instead revises process-lifecycle documentation and its contract tests, with no demonstrated connection to those requirements or a necessary CI fix.\ntests/test_fleet.py:67 onward changes README contract assertions to match the unrelated lifecycle documentation rewrite. No evidence shows these changes are needed for CI independently of that rewrite. This is a scope concern, not a repeat of the previously addressed finding about removed assertions."
}
],
"notes": [],
"failed": [],
"pending": []
} |
Owner
Author
Lokay Check 3SHA: Wynik: pending · CI: pending · tests: pending · tested=false Uwagi i CI: {
"uwagi": [],
"notes": [],
"failed": [],
"pending": [
"test (3.13)"
]
} |
Owner
Author
Lokay Check 3SHA: Wynik: merge · CI: green · tests: green · tested=true
Uwagi i CI: {
"uwagi": [],
"notes": [],
"failed": [],
"pending": []
} |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue #89
Cel
Usunąć potwierdzone rozbieżności README.md z cyklem życia procesów fleet. Wymagana poprawka dokumentacji nie potwierdza przywrócenia Hermesa ani wznowienia #80. Zgłoszenie pozostaje wyłącznie materiałem dowodowym.
Kryteria
Kroki
Zmienione pliki
Checks
SHA:
a615be526f345f500b6a020eb4f55e4b1d1758e5Closes #89
Opened by lokay.