Repository navigation
research: scientific peer review as Pack - #364
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Companion research note for a topic-agnostic scientific-paper Pack: journal roles and decisions, CONSORT/PRISMA/ARRIVE as overlays, integrity Close/Defect rules, primers as SourceUnits, and Temida legal Packs on the same engine. Co-authored-by: Patryk Mikołajczyk <mikolaj92@users.noreply.github.com>
Emphasize that a topic-agnostic paper Pack plus manuscript is the proving ground for name-sentence-by-sentence → judge → act/score: pros, cons, and ten wrong assumptions. Cross-link the example Pack path and in-tree paper fixture; no engine changes. Co-authored-by: Patryk Mikołajczyk <mikolaj92@users.noreply.github.com>
mikolaj92
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 29, 2026 17:44
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Research only. No engine, API, profile, or Pack JSON changes.
Companion note for a scientific-paper platform Pack, now framed as the poligon (proving ground) for the three-pass slogan:
Report:
docs/research/scientific-peer-review-as-pack.mdVerdict. Completeness/integrity yes; merit/novelty no. The roles name / judge / act survive. The naive clock (every sentence, then a score or rewrite) does not. Shipped 0.24 is two plant scans plus optional write. A journal accept/reject is the editor’s homeostat, not pass 3. Do not change the engine to make the slogan look true.
New §1 is the poligon:
covered(), optional act off)In tree today:
examples/packs/story.json,tests/fixtures/notice.pack.json, corpus"paper"intests/test_conformance_corpus.py(overclaim, n=12). Not in tree:examples/packs/scientific_paper.json(landing path linked; sibling platform PR). A two-sentence corpus string is not evidence that sentence-by-sentence name is cheap or sufficient.Still covered from the first revision: journal roles/decisions, CONSORT/PRISMA/ARRIVE as overlays, primers as
SourceUnits (URLs/titles in Pack data only), Temida = same engine different Pack.