chore(deps): lock file maintenance

[its-miso]

This PR contains the following updates:

Update	Change
lockFileMaintenance	All locks refreshed

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone America/Edmonton)

• Branch creation
  • "before 5am on monday"
• Automerge
  • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

[its-saffron]

AI Automated Review

Full PR review.

Analysis engine: MiniMax-M2.7@https://litellm.jory.dev/v1 (anthropic) — escalated (fast_low_confidence)

PR Review: PR 126 — Lock File Maintenance

Recommendation: Approve

This is a standard lock-file refresh by Renovate, touching only kubetix-web/package-lock.json. All CI checks passed.

---

Change-by-Change Summary

The lock file is being refreshed from 4.3.1 → 4.3.2 for the Tailwind CSS v4 ecosystem (a pure-patch release of @tailwindcss/node, @tailwindcss/oxide, @tailwindcss/postcss, and tailwindcss itself). Supporting transitive packages were also updated:

• @tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi pulls in updated @emnapi/* deps (1.10.0 → 1.11.1/1.11.1/1.2.2)
• axios: 1.18.0 → 1.18.1
• baseline-browser-mapping: 2.10.38 → 2.10.40
• caniuse-lite: 1.0.30001799 → 1.0.30001800
• lucide-react: 1.21.0 → 1.23.0
• nanoid: 3.3.13 → 3.3.15
• electron-to-chromium: 1.5.376 → 1.5.384
• node-releases: 2.0.48 → 2.0.50
• postcss: 8.5.15 → 8.5.16

All are patch or minor bumps with no API-surface changes expected.

---

Required Checks — Explicit Responses

1. Check for breaking API changes in updated dependencies

• ✅ Tailwind CSS 4.3.1 → 4.3.2: Patch release; no breaking API changes. Tailwind v4 is CSS-first with no JS API surface that consumer code depends on directly.
• ✅ axios 1.18.0 → 1.18.1: Minor patch; axios maintains backward compatibility across 1.x patch releases. No API-surface changes expected.
• ✅ lucide-react 1.21.0 → 1.23.0: Minor version bump. lucide-react follows semver and this range is unlikely to introduce breaking changes, but it is the highest-risk bump here. However, CI's frontend-build and e2e-tests both passed, which exercised the web UI with the updated deps.
• ✅ All other changed packages are pure build-tooling / browser-compatibility metadata (caniuse-lite, electron-to-chromium, node-releases) with no public API.

2. Run full test suite after upgrade

• ✅ CI test suite executed and passed: The CI check results table shows test, legacy-test, frontend-build, e2e-tests, and build-and-publish all completed with success. This is the authoritative evidence that the full test suite ran against the updated lockfile and passed.

---

Standards Compliance

• ✅ PR is a Renovate lock-file maintenance PR — this is a documented, expected workflow per the AGENTS.md "Dependency Management / Renovate Configuration" section.
• ✅ No source files were modified; only the lockfile.
• ✅ The PR is correctly labeled as lockFileMaintenance by Renovate.
• ✅ Automerge is disabled in Renovate config for this PR type, requiring manual merge — appropriate given it comes from a bot.

---

Unknowns / Needs Verification

None. All evidence is complete:

• The CI check table is authoritative proof of a successful test run.
• The lockfile diff shows only patch/minor bumps with no semantic version jumps that would signal breaking changes.
• No platform-coupling exists in this change — this is a pure Node.js/frontend dependency refresh with no host platform version pinned elsewhere in the repo.

---

Linked Issue Fit

No linked issue was present in the PR body, so this section is not applicable.

---

Evidence Provider Findings

No evidence providers were configured for this run; N/A.

---

Tool Harness Findings

No tool calls were issued. The review relied entirely on the provided corpus (CI results, diff, PR metadata), which was sufficient.