Skip to content

bench: pass verification policy to load runner - #124

Merged
mjc merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/benchmark-verification-policy
Sep 14, 2026
Merged

mjc merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/benchmark-verification-policy

Conversation

@mjc

@mjc mjc commented Sep 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • pass the selected verification policy through both benchmark client launch paths
  • print the policy and pipeline depth in benchmark output

Evidence

  • shell diff is whitespace-clean
  • the script preserves full verification as its default

All commits are GPG-signed.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

Next included review available in 14 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 5c64e3dc-ebc2-4ff0-8518-371ab4987ef2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 54004ed and 12a2c49.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • scripts/bench-release-cache-miss-e2e.sh

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@mjc
mjc force-pushed the chore/benchmark-verification-policy branch from 96f4bd9 to 12a2c49 Compare September 14, 2026 02:53
@mjc
mjc merged commit 1bc2852 into main Sep 14, 2026
8 checks passed
@mjc
mjc deleted the chore/benchmark-verification-policy branch September 14, 2026 02:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant