A Claude Code skill that summons 8 great thinkers to attack your problem from radically different angles.
Not roleplay — 8 irreplaceable cognitive frameworks colliding with your question. Each advisor uses their real thinking signature, they argue with each other, expose your blind spots, and deliver concrete next moves.
| Seat | Thinker | Thinking Signature |
|---|---|---|
| First Principles | Elon Musk | Decompose to physics, rebuild from atoms |
| Inversion | Charlie Munger | Invert, always invert |
| Systems Dynamics | Donella Meadows | Feedback loops, leverage points, delays |
| Human Nature | Robert Cialdini | Behavioral psychology, persuasion |
| Historical Patterns | Ray Dalio | Big cycles, debt cycles, historical rhymes |
| Disruptive Innovation | Clayton Christensen | Low-end disruption, Jobs to be Done |
| Incentive Structures | Naval Ravikant | Game theory, compounding, leverage |
| Antifragility | Nassim Taleb | Black swans, convexity, barbell strategy |
Each session produces:
- Council Meeting — Each advisor attacks your specific situation (not generic theory)
- Clash Points — The sharpest disagreements between advisors
- Blind Spots — 1-3 angles you probably haven't considered
- Next Moves — 3-5 concrete actions you can start tomorrow
Copy SKILL.md to your Claude Code skills directory:
# Create the skill directory
mkdir -p .claude/skills/council
# Copy the skill file
cp SKILL.md .claude/skills/council/SKILL.mdIn Claude Code, trigger with:
/council- "council"
- "wisdom council"
- "help me think about..."
- "analyze this for me"
Then describe your question, dilemma, or decision.
- Collision > Harmony — If all 8 agree, the question is too simple or the collision isn't strong enough
- Specific > Abstract — Not "consider systemic risk," but "your scraper depends on Reddit's API, which will likely tighten after IPO — that's your single point of failure"
- Edge > Politeness — Munger will say "this idea is stupid because..." Taleb will say "you're picking up pennies in front of a steamroller"
- Skip non-contributors — If an advisor has nothing unique to add, they stay silent. 5 sharp takes > 8 mediocre ones
MIT