Skip to content

chore: adopt DA Sequencer - #164

Draft
l-monninger wants to merge 4 commits into
l-monninger/box-enironmentfrom
l-monninger/adopt-da-sequencer
Draft

chore: adopt DA Sequencer#164
l-monninger wants to merge 4 commits into
l-monninger/box-enironmentfrom
l-monninger/adopt-da-sequencer

Conversation

@l-monninger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Adopts DA Sequencer with the intent of resolving #160 and #161.

@l-monninger
l-monninger changed the base branch from main to l-monninger/box-enironment June 18, 2025 07:46
@l-monninger

l-monninger commented Jun 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@musitdev

Because we are trying to make this programmable via the Config (MovementConfig) directly, it is written to the expected location before the application composition starts. Currently, whatever we are doing seems to cause no genesis:

"chain_id":27,"epoch":"0","ledger_version":"0","oldest_ledger_version":"0","ledger_timestamp":"0","node_role":"validator","oldest_block_height":"0","block_height":"0","git_hash":"1d1cdbbd7fabb80dcb95ba5e23213faa072fab67"}

This causes the faucet to fail, of course.

Could you compare and suggest what might be wrong that is not satisfying something that would usually occur during the setup:

@musitdev

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What is the command you use to see this behaviour?

@l-monninger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

What is the command you use to see this behaviour?

@musitdev

You can use:

cargo test -p movement-core

This pretty much shows up anywhere you use the movement-core lib though.

@l-monninger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@musitdev still need your ideas here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants