You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
How would this differ from the current explainST() functionality? Is it just that the hierarchical levels are called out explicitly before the definition? This should be possible since the parsing of formative elements is now aware of the hierarchy context
explainST generates reasonable fixed-width text output. I kind of like the retro look. I think that this was an idea on a more compact representation. Not a high priority, but a stub for a new grid graphics based output.
Could you add some context about that to the main post then? While the sketch is cool its not clear that it is a graphical output. #11 also references SVG output, so perhaps there is some overlap there?
Activity
brownag commentedon Sep 16, 2022
How would this differ from the current
explainST()functionality? Is it just that the hierarchical levels are called out explicitly before the definition? This should be possible since the parsing of formative elements is now aware of the hierarchy contextdylanbeaudette commentedon Sep 16, 2022
explainSTgenerates reasonable fixed-width text output. I kind of like the retro look. I think that this was an idea on a more compact representation. Not a high priority, but a stub for a new grid graphics based output.brownag commentedon Sep 16, 2022
Could you add some context about that to the main post then? While the sketch is cool its not clear that it is a graphical output. #11 also references SVG output, so perhaps there is some overlap there?