NLP and context with udpipe #12

Activity

1. brownag commented on Jul 26, 2019

   

   brownag

   on Jul 26, 2019

   Member

   More actions

   this!
2. brownag commented on Sep 16, 2022

   

   brownag

   on Sep 16, 2022

   Last edited by brownag

   Member

   More actions

   I would be open to seeing a pull request that implements NLP for some of the components that are now available in the package datasets.

   I can't allocate any work time to this right now, but all of the pieces are there, or otherwise can be made available as products of SoilKnowledgeBase. Anyone interested in taking this on can contact me for pointers.
3. brownag

   added

   help wanted

   good-first-issueGood first issue for new contributorsGood first issue for new contributors

   on Sep 16, 2022
4. dylanbeaudette commented on Sep 16, 2022

   

   dylanbeaudette

   on Sep 16, 2022

   MemberAuthor

   More actions

   This was more of an open-ended note to myself. Besides issues, are there better places for such notes / ideas?
5. brownag commented on Sep 16, 2022

   

   brownag

   on Sep 16, 2022

   Member

   More actions

   I have enabled discussions for this repo a while back (https://github.com/ncss-tech/SoilTaxonomy/discussions). These were not available in 2019.

   I think it is a fine "issue" if it contains something "actionable" that can be resolved. Discussions are more appropriate for open-ended things. Notes to yourself... possibly could be kept to yourself? I am not saying there is anything wrong with what is here, but I don't think we need to leave open-ended issues open for years.
6. dylanbeaudette commented on Sep 16, 2022

   

   dylanbeaudette

   on Sep 16, 2022

   MemberAuthor

   More actions

   I'll move all issues that are more open-ended ideas over to the discussions and then close.
7. ncss-tech

   locked and limited conversation to collaborators on Sep 25, 2026
8. brownag

   converted this issue into a discussion #54 on Sep 25, 2026