Skip to content

Conversation

@adamoutler
Copy link
Contributor

@adamoutler adamoutler commented Jan 18, 2026

Updated with correct instructions for retrieving API_TOKEN in tests.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated authentication guidance with a new container-based token retrieval method using Python one-liners in Docker.
    • Added concrete code snippets for extracting API tokens from running containers.
    • Enhanced troubleshooting section with additional validation steps and consistency improvements across related sections.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Updated instructions for retrieving API_TOKEN in tests.
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 18, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation updates to authentication guidance in GEMINI.md, replacing an indirect token retrieval method that depended on helper functions with a direct docker exec-based Python one-liner approach. Includes concrete code snippets and updated troubleshooting sections for consistency.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Authentication Documentation Updates
\.gemini/GEMINI.md``
Replaced helper.get_setting_value() token retrieval method with inline docker exec Python one-liner; added concrete code snippets for extracting API_TOKEN from running containers; updated troubleshooting section to include app.conf readability check and Python-based token validation; replicated new approach across related documentation sections

Poem

🐰 A token retrieved with a one-liner so fine,
Docker exec whispers, the API is mine,
No helpers required, just Python inline,
The troubleshooting flows, perfectly aligned!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately reflects the main change: updating API_TOKEN retrieval instructions in the documentation with improved container-based methods.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
.gemini/GEMINI.md (1)

55-58: Fix troubleshooting numbering/typo and placeholder consistency.
"23 Verify Python can read it" looks like an accidental line number, and <ID> is inconsistent with <CONTAINER_ID>. This can confuse copy/paste usage in docs.

✏️ Suggested edit
-2. Verify `app.conf` inside the container: `docker exec <ID> cat /data/config/app.conf`
-23 Verify Python can read it: `docker exec <ID> python3 -c "from helper import get_setting_value; print(get_setting_value('API_TOKEN'))"`
+2. Verify `app.conf` inside the container: `docker exec <CONTAINER_ID> cat /data/config/app.conf`
+3. Verify Python can read it: `docker exec <CONTAINER_ID> python3 -c "from helper import get_setting_value; print(get_setting_value('API_TOKEN'))"`

@jokob-sk jokob-sk merged commit 866ce56 into netalertx:main Jan 18, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants