Skip to content

JopeDime v1.0.0 master merge (v1/fastlane) - #2071

Closed
jepsontaylor wants to merge 2403 commits into
mainfrom
v1/fastlane
Closed

jepsontaylor wants to merge 2403 commits into
mainfrom
v1/fastlane

Conversation

@jepsontaylor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JopeDime v1.0.0 master merge: v1/fastlane -> main

This is the single consolidated v1 PR. Opened by Jepson's instruction at 2026-11-02 4:19 PM MST. MASTER_MERGE_HOLD is in force. Do not merge until Jepson approves.

Plan status

  • 137/137 plan tasks are DONE (audit/FINISH_137.md).
  • JRB-01: 54/54 datasets are qualified, with SPLIT_RECOMMENDED (dbe5ac0d…).
  • QLT-04: the Q1 sustained-load gate is INCOMPLETE. Attempt-09 finished 29 units and 522 failed with backend errors, and the root-cause review is ongoing. Learned guidance ships OFF (OWNER-R21, guidance_default = "OFF", 399facf2…).
  • REL-07: 27 gates PASS and M3 is waived (WAIVED_V1_0_0, 21/21 waiver guards verified) on RC4 source ccaf14b210b3 (a6dc6698e1dd, plus the independent review 9a69fec4… by luna_v1_res08).

Contents

  • The branch is 1139 commits ahead of main and 0 behind at candidate b5d97bd69142. GitHub's count updates as lanes push.
  • At t2320 (Jepson 4:20 PM MST), every remaining unmerged branch was folded in: 7 squash folds, one commit per branch, with the branch name in the message. The full branch -> fold-commit/skip mapping is in ~/jope_plan/master/audit/FOLD_ALL_t2320.md. No branch was deleted and no PR was closed.
  • Backup tags: backup/pre-final-pr-20261102T2322Z-main (6855922), backup/pre-final-pr-20261102T2322Z-fastlane (b6417b7) and backup/pre-fold-t2320-fastlane (b6417b7).

Jankurai (latest rerun/LOOP_LATEST.md)

2026-11-02T23:25:04Z, jankurai 1.7.6 on v1/fastlane b6417b78d: score=68, caps=10, findings=24. The caps are python-direct-product-truth-or-db-ownership, non-optimal-product-language-found, too-much-python-in-product-surface, vibe-placeholders-in-product-code, fallback-soup-in-product-code, severe-duplication-in-product-code, false-green-test-risk, input-boundary-gap, streaming-runtime-drift and repo-rot-bad-behavior. Cap-fixing lanes keep pushing to v1/fastlane, which updates this PR.

CI

  • Local cluster CI runs per audit/LOCAL_CI_PLAN.md on xbabe1/2/3/4 (Linux plus macOS arm64 and Colima Linux containers) against a frozen CANDIDATE_SHA. Results go to audit/LOCAL_CI_RESULTS.md / .json. Fixes land on v1/fastlane, and only the affected shards rerun after a re-freeze.
  • GitHub CI on this PR may run, but it is not blocking.

Merge method

Once CI is green and Jepson approves (lifting MASTER_MERGE_HOLD), this merges with --merge, never squash or rebase, so the released tree is the exact tested CANDIDATE_SHA tree.

@jepsontaylor
jepsontaylor marked this pull request as draft November 3, 2026 16:44
@jepsontaylor
jepsontaylor marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2026 16:44
@jepsontaylor
jepsontaylor marked this pull request as draft November 3, 2026 18:06
@jepsontaylor
jepsontaylor marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2026 18:06
jekko and others added 3 commits November 3, 2026 18:41
Approved-by: Jepson (card t262s2261, 2026-11-03 11:38 MST)
Root cause: interactive_exit waited for the removed Powered by JopeDime tagline while screen.rs renders /open <file.csv>.

Verified: x86 xbabe2 pty_smoke 4/4 tests; interactive_exit 5/5 key cases.

Agent-Session: jk-cap-release
Agent-Model: gpt-6-luna medium
Agent-Task:
@jepsontaylor
jepsontaylor marked this pull request as draft November 3, 2026 19:15
@jepsontaylor
jepsontaylor marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2026 19:15
…or R9087 lambda locks

Root cause: run 41701566692 hygiene failed deploy/ci/test-bump.sh 32/36. R9087 recorded the csv
Cargo.lock (db7e387e) with a non-sync tree_change but no retained version_sync_base, and reworded
the regression-ops, regression, lambda-worker and s1-proposal tree_change so it no longer matches
SYNC_RECORD, so just bump refused to bring the Lambda locks along.

Fix (SNAPSHOT.json only, no lock bytes or hashes change), via the owning commands:
  lambda-workspaces.sh snapshot-sync-base deploy/lambda/csv/rust/Cargo.lock cb875c0
  lambda-workspaces.sh snapshot-refresh <4 locks> with the standard sync-record reason

Verified x86 xbabe2: fast-lane hygiene RC=0 (test-bump 56/56), tools/security-lane.sh RC=0,
check_evidence_exclusions PASS (472), snapshot-check 96/96.

Approved-by: Jepson (card t264s2278, 2026-11-03 12:55 MST): "Yes, approve RED R9091, land it in one flush (with the shard-3 move if it times out), then toggle #2071 once on the new head"

Agent-Session: wt2
Agent-Model: gpt-6-luna medium
Agent-Task:
@jepsontaylor
jepsontaylor marked this pull request as draft November 3, 2026 19:56
@jepsontaylor
jepsontaylor marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2026 19:56
Run 41707964561 on 9986dae: rust-test (3) on xbabe1-ci hit 8 nextest
240s per-test TIMEOUTs (feat-math advanced_v3_fitted_cpp, cumulative_integration_v2,
finite_difference_v2 x3, golden x3) while xbabe1 carried load 15+ from other
lanes; the same slice passed in 16 min on xbabe1-ci in runs 41690638984 and
41701566692. Pin slice 3 to the native xbabe2-full jope-ci lane (cargo-target
lane "full" is already supported). No test, timeout or partition changes.

Approved-by: Jepson (t264u, 2026-11-03 12:47 MST): if rust-test shard 3 times
out on xbabe1-ci again, move it to xbabe2 in ci.yml as a RED fix.

Agent-Session: wt4
Agent-Model: gpt-6-luna medium
Agent-Task:

Landing-approved-by: Jepson (card t264s2300, 2026-11-03 14:00 MST): "Yes, land
R9092 in one flush and toggle #2071 once on the new head".
@jepsontaylor
jepsontaylor marked this pull request as draft November 3, 2026 21:01
@jepsontaylor
jepsontaylor marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2026 21:01
@jepsontaylor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Superseded by #2115 (linear rebase of v1/fastlane with aggregate fixes), fast-forwarded to main with Jepson's approval 2026-11-03.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants