Merged
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
docs
Contributor
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new documentation page describing the "Lite Package" distribution (packaging, intended use, and upgrade/downgrade semantics) and updates the troubleshooting doc's sidebar ordering. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsTimed out fetching pipeline failures after 30000ms Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/docs/deployment/lite-package.md (2)
22-25: Consider documenting how Lite installs are detected.This section explains removed functionality, but adding one line about the
Info.plistmarker (SNTIsLite) would make operational/debug behavior clearer and technically precise.Suggested addition
Santa includes an optional network extension for adding telemetry of network events. While this extension can only be activated by Workshop customers, its presence on disk is enough to make a small number of users uncomfortable. +Lite installations are identified via the app bundle `Info.plist` key +`SNTIsLite=true`; removal of `sleigh`/`santanetd` is a consequence of that mode.Based on learnings: In northpolesec/santa (PR
#841), Lite installation detection is driven by theSNTIsLitekey in the app bundleInfo.plist.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/docs/deployment/lite-package.md` around lines 22 - 25, Add a one-line note in the "Lite package" doc stating how Lite installs are detected: mention the Info.plist key SNTIsLite in the app bundle is used to mark/detect Lite installations (reference SNTIsLite and Info.plist in the text near the removed-functionality paragraph).
24-33: Optional wording cleanup for readability.Phrases like “a small number of users” and “exact same” are slightly wordy; tightening them would improve scanability.
Optional wording tweak
-events. While this extension can only be activated by Workshop customers, its -presence on disk is enough to make a small number of users uncomfortable. +events. While this extension can only be activated by Workshop customers, its +presence on disk is enough to make some users uncomfortable. @@ -The lite package is created from the exact same build as the regular package +The lite package is created from the same build as the regular package🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/docs/deployment/lite-package.md` around lines 24 - 33, Reword the paragraph under the "What's the downside of the Lite package?" heading to tighten phrasing: replace "a small number of users" with a more concise phrase like "some users", change "the exact same build" to "the same build", and simplify the testing sentence to something like "This package receives less testing than the full package — we perform regular upgrade testing for the full release but cannot include the Lite package due to the larger test matrix." Update the text around signing/notarizing/packaging as needed to keep the same meaning while improving readability.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/docs/deployment/lite-package.md`:
- Around line 16-19: The sentence "but those components will not enable
themselves without Workshop anyway." starts with a lowercase 'but'—capitalize it
to "But" to fix sentence capitalization in the user-facing guidance; update the
sentence text accordingly and run a quick spell/grammar check on the surrounding
paragraph to ensure punctuation remains correct.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/docs/deployment/lite-package.md`:
- Around line 22-25: Add a one-line note in the "Lite package" doc stating how
Lite installs are detected: mention the Info.plist key SNTIsLite in the app
bundle is used to mark/detect Lite installations (reference SNTIsLite and
Info.plist in the text near the removed-functionality paragraph).
- Around line 24-33: Reword the paragraph under the "What's the downside of the
Lite package?" heading to tighten phrasing: replace "a small number of users"
with a more concise phrase like "some users", change "the exact same build" to
"the same build", and simplify the testing sentence to something like "This
package receives less testing than the full package — we perform regular upgrade
testing for the full release but cannot include the Lite package due to the
larger test matrix." Update the text around signing/notarizing/packaging as
needed to keep the same meaning while improving readability.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: a9c2c300-5886-40f6-be88-d975b839863b
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/docs/deployment/lite-package.mddocs/docs/deployment/troubleshooting.md
mlw
previously approved these changes
Apr 9, 2026
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/docs/deployment/lite-package.md`:
- Line 11: Change the section headings that are currently level 3 (###) to level
2 (##) so the markdown follows proper hierarchy; update the header "Why does the
Lite package exist?" and the other subsection headings in this document (the
similar headings around the occurrences noted) from ### to ## to increment
correctly from the top-level title. Ensure all four affected heading lines use
"##" consistently and leave the rest of the content unchanged.
- Line 20: Update the sentence that reads "The lite package is built from the
same artifacts as the full package, then" to use consistent capitalization by
changing "lite" to "Lite" (i.e., modify the phrase "The lite package..." to "The
Lite package...") so it matches the rest of the document's capitalization.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 947707c7-f631-4dac-833a-c10bf7fbf0ee
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/docs/deployment/lite-package.md
mlw
approved these changes
Apr 9, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.