Correct the state-comparison scope in the publication receipt - #52
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The new outreach receipt repeated the X post's unsupported claim that physics states were bitwise identical. The existing verifier compares saved state/action arrays numerically; it does not compare full simulator state or floating-point bit patterns.
Correct the receipt, link to the existing comparison scope, keep render-hash and policy-input counts separate, and distinguish the repository correction from an unposted X correction. Preserve the external thread URL and submission history.
Validation: checked against the existing stress comparison documentation and verified repeat aggregate; local links and git diff --check pass. Documentation-only change.