[numlia]

Background

Prepare the v1.8.0 release: the worktreePathTemplate setting and Create Worktree in Branch Cleanup (#114), and the Highlight File History fix for Git 2.56 (#127).

Changes

• CHANGELOG: move the two feat: suggest worktree paths and create them from Branch Cleanup #114 entries from Unreleased into a new 1.8.0 section with a summary, add the Git 2.56 fix under Fixed, and update the compare links.
• Bump the version to 1.8.0.

Points to review

• README is unchanged: feat: suggest worktree paths and create them from Branch Cleanup #114 already documented the setting and the Branch Cleanup action, and the file history fix restores the behavior README already describes.
  • See: README.md (Features and Worktrees settings)
• The perspective translation and the PR feat: suggest worktree paths and create them from Branch Cleanup #114 follow-up tests (docs: translate the config, extension and worktreePath perspectives (1/7 of #126) #128 to docs: translate the messageHandler, refMenu and media perspectives (7/7 of #126) #134) are not in the CHANGELOG, because they do not change the extension's behavior.
  • See: CHANGELOG.md 1.8.0

After merging, run /release 1.8.0 to create and push the tag.

---

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Configure suggested worktree paths with a customizable template.
  • Create worktrees directly from Branch Cleanup actions.
• Bug Fixes
  • Highlight File History now follows earlier file paths through any number of renames across Git versions.
• Release
  • Version 1.8.0 is available, with comparison links updated to identify HEAD as unreleased and link to the new release.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-27T22:11:48.480722Z	39ee99c	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Recent review info

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: numlia/git-keizu
• Branch: docs/release-v1.8.0
• File: .coderabbit.yaml
• Commit: 39ee99c
• Layers: Repository YAML
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 03e6746f-cdd7-46ff-8cbe-d430d92ba4cc

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0228ea0 and 39ee99c.

Files selected for processing: 2

• CHANGELOG.md
• package.json

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

Walkthrough

The changelog adds the 1.8.0 release notes and comparison link. The package version changes from 1.7.1 to 1.8.0.

Changes: Release metadata

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Document and version the release package.json, CHANGELOG.md	The package version changes to 1.8.0. The changelog records worktree features and a file-history fix, and updates the release comparison links.

Priority: Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~4 minutes

Change: Other

Possibly related PRs

• numlia/git-keizu#114: Implements the worktree features documented in this release.
• numlia/git-keizu#127: Implements the file-history fix documented in this release.
• numlia/git-keizu#132: Adds tests and documentation for the worktree behavior documented in this release.

Suggested reviewers: loocor

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to 39ee9

The release metadata is consistent and ready to merge.

Pre-merge checks: 5

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check		Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check		The title clearly and concisely describes the main changes: preparing the v1.8.0 release through changelog updates and the version bump.
Docstring Coverage		No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Documentation-only edits and deletions within survi…
Linked Issues check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (2 skipped: 2 unsupported.)

Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[devin-ai-integration]

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no bugs or issues to report.