Repository navigation
fix(release): generate SDK bindings and fix acceptance races - #271
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
@codex review Please review head |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
Current-head readiness receipt for |
|
@codex review Please review current head |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. You're on a roll. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
Current-head readiness receipt for |
|
@codex review Please review final head |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep them coming! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
Current-head readiness receipt for |
|
Full acceptance on |
|
Accepted current head |
|
Merge verification correction: GitHub PR metadata reported the older base, but actual merge |
|
Exact-tag |
A fresh
v0.11.7-preview.4checkout compiled the SDK before generating its ignored TypeScript Protobuf bindings, so all six VSIX targets failed with TS2307. Install the pinned Go 1.25/Python 3.10.18 tools and run the canonical SDK installer/generator before compilation; tracked SDK drift fails the job. Retain extension checks, exact-target native keyring integrity checks and packaging gates, and cache all three lockfiles.Repair two native acceptance races. Enabled background scheduled tasks shared the fixture's pending provider response and could consume the explicit bridge run's tool call; reserve that one-shot response for the latest explicit bridge input, including scalar and multipart content. The workflow test also audited contrast immediately after changing themes, sometimes measuring intermediate button/background colors; wait for the actual CSS transitions to finish before both theme audits. Background execution, normal animations, all approval/idempotency assertions and every accessibility rule remain intact. Runtime policy and runtime/UI/SDK sources are unchanged.
Validation:
e05323d40846e298f37979d0881346fd6c34930d84d2d85ddfc7e69acdd5e1ef.Failed tags
.3and.4remain unchanged and unpublished. After complete acceptance and normal merge, use a new unused annotated preview tag, verify all 38 assets against exact-tag Actions candidates, and complete container/VSIX publication and anonymous digest verification. The original operator Mac account/UI check remains coordinated and pending in #265 comment 6043952713.