This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 7, 2019. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code above actually overwrites everything in
accountandnewAccountwithname: 'Test User'etc., even ifnewAccount.namehas a value. Not sure if that's what you wanted.To merge the objects with precedence to supplied
newAccountproperties, use:const account = Object.assign({name: 'Test User', entryYear: '2001', major: 'Mechanical Engineering'}, newAccount)(if you keep the defaults as an object literal – in that case, the literal is mutated into the merged object each time)or
const account = Object.assign({}, AccountDefaults, newAccount)(if you move the defaults to a global).If you're using redux, you've probably got Babel / webpack set up with the object rest spread operator. In that case, you can also write
const account = {...AccountDefaults, ...newAccount}https://jsfiddle.net/owsteele/5wk3tzLf/1/