README: main's protection is enforced — code-owner review is on; drop the stale 'known gap' - #10
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…'known gap' paragraph described a state that no longer exists Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016Q9UohWfy2scPhr4pavhqd
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The "For maintainers" section still carried a Known gap paragraph saying
.github/CODEOWNERSonly auto-requests reviewers "until Require review from Code Owners is enabled on the branch protection rule", and telling readers to treat a greencatalogcheck as evidence rather than proof.That state no longer exists. The branch protection on
main, read from the API today:catalog, strict (branch up to date withmain)CODEOWNERScovers/.claude-plugin/,/scripts/and/.github/. So a PR that edits the workflow or the validator cannot merge without a code owner reading that diff, which closes exactly the gap the paragraph described. The bullet now states what is enforced, in one place, and the caveat is gone.Docs only; no change to the catalog or the rules.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_016Q9UohWfy2scPhr4pavhqd