Skip to content

JOSS review: Writing style in paper #87

Description

@mdpiper

This issue is raised in reference to JOSS submission 3052.

The writing style in the paper is colloquial; in particular, the sections Statement of Need and Novelties. The language is understandable (I enjoyed reading the paper!), but it's suited more for a magazine article or a blog post. Since JOSS is an academic journal, the language needs to be more precise. The paper in general, and the sections mentioned above in particular, should be edited to reduce verbosity and use more precise language.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions