Skip to content

JOSS review: Functionality documentation #90

Description

@mdpiper

This issue is raised in reference to JOSS submission 3052.

Overall, the documentation is very helpful. However, the scoring measures used, including:

  • Interval Anomaly score
  • Bernoulli Score
  • Best-of-two score
  • Log normal score
  • Poisson score
  • rarity and severity scores
  • critical and unique words for each message

are mentioned in the paper and in the documentation, but they aren't defined in either. Also, how are these scores combined to create the final score? This information should be in either the paper or the documentation.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions