-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
[WIP] EMLE embedding #159
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[WIP] EMLE embedding #159
Changes from all commits
eb198b4
09a327e
ec4bb0e
1b47c4c
294aea0
66c2492
876bad8
fc95e6a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | ||
| pytest | ||
| pygit2 | ||
| mace-torch | ||
| loguru | ||
| torchani==2.2.4 | ||
| setuptools<81 | ||
| git+https://github.com/chemle/emle-engine.git@6cb9bbd14008788ae83bd9d39a27b11e0e3407f7 | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -409,6 +409,27 @@ To avoid double-counting bonded interactions between the MM force field and ML p | |
| - All MM angles and torsions contained completely within the ML region, but accounting for the presence of any link | ||
| atoms and bonds leaving the region. | ||
|
|
||
| ### EMLE | ||
|
|
||
| OpenMM-ML supports the EMLE (Electrostatic Machine Learning Embedding) method through an interface with the | ||
| [EMLE-Engine](https://chemle.github.io/emle-engine/) package. The following embedding names are supported. | ||
|
|
||
| | Name | Model | | ||
| | --- | --- | | ||
| | `emle` | Default pretrained [EMLE](https://github.com/chemle/emle-models) model. | | ||
| | `emle-engine` | Use a custom EMLE-Engine model loaded from a local file. | | ||
|
|
||
| The following extra keyword arguments are recognized by the embedding: | ||
|
|
||
| | Name | Model | | ||
| | --- | --- | | ||
| | `embeddingModelPath` | Path to a local model, only used (and required) if `emle-engine` is given as the embedding name. | | ||
| | `alphaMode` | The mode for computing atomic polarizabilities: can be `'species'` (default) or `'reference'`. See the [EMLE-Engine API documentation](https://chemle.github.io/emle-engine/api/index_models.html#emle.models.EMLE) for more details. | | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Note that
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'll update this documentation, and also change the code to not pass the keyword argument to EMLE if the user doesn't specify it; this way, the default won't be hard-coded in OpenMM-ML. |
||
| | `cutoffDistance` | The cutoff distance for EMLE. Must be an `openmm.unit.Quantity` with distance units. Beyond this distance from the ML region, MM atoms will not have an effect. The default value is 0.75 nm. | | ||
| | `switchingDistance` | The switching distance for EMLE. Must be an `openmm.unit.Quantity` with distance units. Between this distance and the cutoff distance from the ML region, the effect of MM atoms will go smoothly to zero. The default value is 0.6 nm. | | ||
| | `precision` | `'single'` for single precision or `'double'` for double precision. | | ||
| | `device` | The PyTorch device to perform calculations on, either a `torch.device` object or a string (such as `'cuda'` or `'cpu'`.) If omitted, a device is chosen automatically. | | ||
|
|
||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Do we also want to support the other embedding schemes available in emle-engine? Please see: https://github.com/chemle/emle-engine/blob/devel/emle/models/_emle.py#L101-L114. They have been used in some recent papers.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I wasn't sure if there were benefits to exposing anything other than
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think at least the
|
||
| ## Other Packages | ||
|
|
||
| OpenMM-ML is based on a plugin architecture, allowing other packages to provide their own interfaces to it. The | ||
|
|
||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1 +1 @@ | ||
| from . import mechanicalembedding | ||
| from . import mechanicalembedding, emleembedding |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ | ||
| """ | ||
| emleembedding.py: Provides the EMLE (Electrostatic Machine Learning Embedding) | ||
| method as an embedding plugin. | ||
|
|
||
| This is part of the OpenMM molecular simulation toolkit originating from | ||
| Simbios, the NIH National Center for Physics-Based Simulation of | ||
| Biological Structures at Stanford, funded under the NIH Roadmap for | ||
| Medical Research, grant U54 GM072970. See https://simtk.org. | ||
|
|
||
| Portions copyright (c) 2026 Stanford University and the Authors. | ||
| Authors: Evan Pretti | ||
| Contributors: | ||
|
|
||
| Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a | ||
| copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), | ||
| to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation | ||
| the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, | ||
| and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the | ||
| Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: | ||
|
|
||
| The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in | ||
| all copies or substantial portions of the Software. | ||
|
|
||
| THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR | ||
| IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, | ||
| FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL | ||
| THE AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, | ||
| DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR | ||
| OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE | ||
| USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. | ||
| """ | ||
|
|
||
| from openmmml.mlpotential import MLPotentialImpl, Embedding, EmbeddingFactory | ||
| from openmmml.embeddings import utilities | ||
| import openmm | ||
| import openmm.app | ||
| import openmm.unit as unit | ||
| import numpy as np | ||
| from functools import partial | ||
|
|
||
| class EMLEEmbeddingFactory(EmbeddingFactory): | ||
| """This is the factory that creates EMLEEmbedding objects.""" | ||
|
|
||
| def createEmbedding(self, name: str, **args) -> Embedding: | ||
| return EMLEEmbedding(name) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class EMLEEmbedding(Embedding): | ||
| """EMLE (Electrostatic Machine Learning Embedding). This embedding method | ||
| can be used with any ML potential to perform ML/MM simulations. The ML-ML | ||
| interactions will be computed with the ML potential of choice, the MM-MM | ||
| interactions with a conventional force field, and the remaining interactions | ||
| with EMLE. | ||
| """ | ||
|
|
||
| def __init__(self, name: str): | ||
| """ | ||
| Initialize the EMLEEmbedding. | ||
|
|
||
| Parameters | ||
| ---------- | ||
| name : str | ||
| The name of the EMLE model. `emle` (the only builtin model) uses | ||
| the standard EMLE model. `emle-engine` allows you to use a custom | ||
| model supported by the EMLE library. | ||
| """ | ||
|
|
||
| self.name = name | ||
|
|
||
| def createMixedSystem(self, | ||
| potential: MLPotentialImpl, | ||
| topology: openmm.app.Topology, | ||
| system: openmm.System, | ||
| atoms: list[int], | ||
| forceGroup: int, | ||
| interpolate: bool, | ||
| **args) -> openmm.System: | ||
|
|
||
| # Make sure that we can import the EMLE library. | ||
|
|
||
| try: | ||
| from emle.models import EMLE | ||
| except ImportError: | ||
| raise ImportError("Failed to import emle-engine: for installation instructions, visit https://github.com/chemle/emle-engine") | ||
| import torch | ||
|
|
||
| # Get the model path to pass to EMLE. | ||
|
|
||
| if self.name == "emle": | ||
| modelPath = None | ||
| elif self.name == "emle-engine": | ||
| try: | ||
| modelPath = args["embeddingModelPath"] | ||
| except KeyError: | ||
| raise ValueError("For the emle-engine embedding method, an embeddingModelPath must be provided") | ||
| else: | ||
| raise ValueError(f"Unrecognized embedding name {self.name!r} for EMLE (recognized names are emle, emle-engine)") | ||
|
Comment on lines
+89
to
+97
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'd probably suggest simplifying this bit and leaving
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. In MACE we have
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, OK, I get your point. We can leave it as it is then, meaning we'll use As you said, a new pretrained model will likely come along at some point in the future, so I think this actually makes more sense and avoids having to one day change the name of the original |
||
|
|
||
| # Extract additional options to pass to EMLE. | ||
|
|
||
| precision = args.get("precision", None) | ||
| alphaMode = args.get("alphaMode", "species") | ||
| cutoffDistance = args.get("cutoffDistance", 0.75 * unit.nanometer) | ||
| switchingDistance = args.get("switchingDistance", 0.6 * unit.nanometer) | ||
|
|
||
| # Create the new system with ML-ML interactions to be computed by the ML | ||
| # potential removed. | ||
|
|
||
| periodic = system.usesPeriodicBoundaryConditions() | ||
| newSystem = utilities.removeBonds(system, topology, atoms, True) | ||
| numAtoms = newSystem.getNumParticles() | ||
|
|
||
| allCharges = [0.0] * numAtoms | ||
| for force in newSystem.getForces(): | ||
| if isinstance(force, openmm.NonbondedForce): | ||
| # Get charges on all particles. | ||
|
|
||
| for atom in range(numAtoms): | ||
| charge, _, _ = force.getParticleParameters(atom) | ||
| allCharges[atom] += charge.value_in_unit(unit.elementary_charge) | ||
|
|
||
| # All of the LJ interactions in the ML region should be zeroed. | ||
| # The ML-ML and ML-MM electrostatics should both be zeroed. | ||
|
|
||
| for atom in atoms: | ||
| _, sigma, epsilon = force.getParticleParameters(atom) | ||
| force.setParticleParameters(atom, 0, sigma, epsilon) | ||
|
|
||
| for iAtom1 in range(len(atoms)): | ||
| for iAtom2 in range(iAtom1): | ||
| force.addException(atoms[iAtom1], atoms[iAtom2], 0, 1, 0, True) | ||
|
|
||
| # This may cause exceptions in the MM region to use PBCs, but | ||
| # this should not ordinarily have any significant effects. | ||
|
|
||
| force.setExceptionsUsePeriodicBoundaryConditions(periodic) | ||
|
|
||
| elif isinstance(force, openmm.CustomNonbondedForce): | ||
| utilities.makeCustomNonbondedExclusions(force, atoms) | ||
|
|
||
| # Create a PythonForce to compute the EMLE interaction. | ||
|
|
||
| device = potential._getTorchDevice(args) | ||
|
|
||
| if precision is None: | ||
| # This is the default used by the EMLE library if None is given. | ||
| dtype = torch.get_default_dtype() | ||
| elif precision == "single": | ||
| dtype = torch.float32 | ||
| elif precision == "double": | ||
| dtype = torch.float64 | ||
| else: | ||
| raise ValueError(f"Unsupported precision {precision} for the embedding. Supported values are 'single' and 'double'.") | ||
|
|
||
| mlAtomSet = set(atoms) | ||
| mmAtomList = sorted(set(range(numAtoms)) - mlAtomSet) | ||
| topologyAtoms = list(topology.atoms()) | ||
|
|
||
| atomicNumbers = torch.tensor([topologyAtoms[atom].element.atomic_number for atom in atoms], device=device, dtype=int) | ||
| mlCharge = sum(allCharges[atom] for atom in atoms) | ||
| mmCharges = torch.tensor([allCharges[atom] for atom in mmAtomList], device=device) | ||
| mlIndices = torch.tensor(atoms, device=device, dtype=int) | ||
| mmIndices = torch.tensor(mmAtomList, device=device, dtype=int) | ||
|
|
||
| # Trying to pass a float charge to EMLE will give an error. | ||
|
|
||
| mlChargeRounded = round(mlCharge) | ||
| if not np.isclose(mlChargeRounded, mlCharge): | ||
| raise ValueError(f"Non-integer charge on the ML region {mlCharge} unsupported by EMLE") | ||
|
|
||
| emleCutoff = cutoffDistance.value_in_unit(unit.angstrom) | ||
| emleSwitchWidth = 1 - switchingDistance / cutoffDistance | ||
| if not 0 < emleSwitchWidth < 1: | ||
| raise ValueError("Switching distance must be between 0 and cutoff distance") | ||
|
|
||
| model = EMLE(model=modelPath, method="electrostatic", alpha_mode=alphaMode, cutoff=emleCutoff, switch_width=emleSwitchWidth, device=device, dtype=dtype) | ||
| energyScale = (1.0 * unit.hartree / unit.item).value_in_unit(unit.kilojoule_per_mole) | ||
| emleForce = openmm.PythonForce(partial( | ||
| _computeEMLE, | ||
| atomicNumbers=atomicNumbers, | ||
| mlCharge=mlChargeRounded, | ||
| mmCharges=mmCharges, | ||
| mlIndices=mlIndices, | ||
| mmIndices=mmIndices, | ||
| periodic=periodic, | ||
| device=device, | ||
| dtype=dtype, | ||
| model=model, | ||
| energyScale=energyScale, | ||
| )) | ||
| emleForce.setForceGroup(forceGroup) | ||
| emleForce.setUsesPeriodicBoundaryConditions(periodic) | ||
|
|
||
| if interpolate: | ||
| interpolator = utilities.InterpolationHelper() | ||
| interpolator.addMLPotentialTerms(potential, topology, atoms, forceGroup, **args) | ||
| interpolator.addMLTerm(emleForce) | ||
| interpolator.addMMBondedTerms(system, topology, atoms) | ||
| interpolator.setupNonbonded(newSystem, system) | ||
| interpolator.setupInterpolation(newSystem) | ||
|
|
||
| else: | ||
| potential.addForces(topology, newSystem, atoms, forceGroup, **args) | ||
| newSystem.addForce(emleForce) | ||
|
|
||
| return newSystem | ||
|
|
||
| def _computeEMLE(state, atomicNumbers, mlCharge, mmCharges, mlIndices, mmIndices, periodic, device, dtype, model, energyScale): | ||
| import torch | ||
|
|
||
| positions = state.getPositions(asNumpy=True).value_in_unit(unit.angstrom) | ||
| positionsTensor = torch.tensor(positions, dtype=dtype, device=device, requires_grad=True) | ||
|
|
||
| if periodic: | ||
| cell = state.getPeriodicBoxVectors(asNumpy=True).value_in_unit(unit.angstrom) | ||
| cellTensor = torch.tensor(cell, dtype=dtype, device=device) | ||
| else: | ||
| cellTensor = None | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. See chemle/emle-engine#91 for the support we discussed for nonperiodic systems. |
||
|
|
||
| energy = energyScale * model(atomicNumbers, mmCharges, positionsTensor[mlIndices], positionsTensor[mmIndices], cellTensor, mlCharge, preprocess=True, use_switching_function=True) | ||
| energy = energy.sum() | ||
| # For unknown reasons, retain_graph=True appears necessary when calling EMLE | ||
| # even though we are only calling backward() one time. | ||
| energy.backward(retain_graph=True) | ||
| return energy.item(), (-positionsTensor.grad).numpy(force=True) | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ | |
| ], | ||
| 'openmmml.embeddings': [ | ||
| 'mechanical = openmmml.embeddings.mechanicalembedding:MechanicalEmbeddingFactory', | ||
| 'emle-engine = openmmml.embeddings.emleembedding:EMLEEmbeddingFactory', | ||
| 'emle = openmmml.embeddings.emleembedding:EMLEEmbeddingFactory', | ||
|
Comment on lines
+87
to
+88
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This could be made just one as I mentioned previously. |
||
| ] | ||
| } | ||
| ) | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ | ||
| import numpy as np | ||
| import openmm | ||
| import openmm.app | ||
| import os | ||
| import pytest | ||
|
|
||
| from openmmml import MLPotential | ||
|
|
||
| emle = pytest.importorskip("emle", reason="emle is not installed") | ||
| mace = pytest.importorskip("mace", reason="mace is not installed") | ||
| platform_ints = range(openmm.Platform.getNumPlatforms()) | ||
| # Get the path to the test data | ||
| test_data_dir = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)), "data") | ||
|
|
||
| # TODO: EMLE energy values have a lot of numerical noise. Is this expected? | ||
| atol = 0.06 | ||
|
Comment on lines
+15
to
+16
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I might have mentioned this to you already but I think 0.05 kJ/mol is about the single precision limit for Hartree energies, so it might be worth running the tests in double precision. |
||
|
|
||
| @pytest.mark.parametrize("platform_int", list(platform_ints)) | ||
| class TestEMLEEmbedding: | ||
|
|
||
| @pytest.mark.parametrize("interpolate", (False, True)) | ||
| def testEmbedding(self, platform_int, interpolate): | ||
| pdb = openmm.app.PDBFile(os.path.join(test_data_dir, "alanine-dipeptide", "alanine-dipeptide-explicit.pdb")) | ||
|
|
||
| subset = [atom.index for atom in pdb.topology.atoms() if atom.residue.chain.index == 0] | ||
|
|
||
| mm_force_field = openmm.app.ForceField("amber19-all.xml", "amber19/tip3pfb.xml") | ||
| ml_potential = MLPotential("mace-off23-small") | ||
| mm_system = mm_force_field.createSystem(pdb.topology, nonbondedMethod=openmm.app.PME) | ||
| mixed_system = ml_potential.createMixedSystem(pdb.topology, mm_system, subset, embedding="emle", interpolate=interpolate) | ||
|
|
||
| platform = openmm.Platform.getPlatform(platform_int) | ||
| mm_context = openmm.Context(mm_system, openmm.VerletIntegrator(0.001), platform) | ||
| mixed_context = openmm.Context(mixed_system, openmm.VerletIntegrator(0.001), platform) | ||
|
|
||
| mm_context.setPositions(pdb.positions) | ||
| mixed_context.setPositions(pdb.positions) | ||
|
|
||
| mm_energy = mm_context.getState(energy=True).getPotentialEnergy().value_in_unit(openmm.unit.kilojoule_per_mole) | ||
|
|
||
| # Reference energies are computed with EMLECalculator from EMLE-Engine | ||
| expected_energy = -33863.30429558904 | ||
|
|
||
| if interpolate: | ||
| for lambda_value in (0.0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0): | ||
| mixed_context.setParameter("lambda_interpolate", lambda_value) | ||
| mixed_energy = mixed_context.getState(energy=True).getPotentialEnergy().value_in_unit(openmm.unit.kilojoule_per_mole) | ||
| assert np.isclose(mixed_energy, expected_energy * lambda_value + mm_energy * (1 - lambda_value), rtol=0, atol=atol) | ||
|
|
||
| else: | ||
| mixed_energy = mixed_context.getState(energy=True).getPotentialEnergy().value_in_unit(openmm.unit.kilojoule_per_mole) | ||
| assert np.isclose(mixed_energy, expected_energy, rtol=0, atol=atol) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hopefully this won't be needed once we release the base emle-engine package on conda-forge.