feat(web): expose provider auth status - #390
Open
testikun wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
CI context: both Linux Node jobs reach the pre-existing packed standalone Web CLI smoke, install the tarball, and then the server exits before announcing its origin ( This PR does not change package metadata, CLI startup, or peer-dependency resolution. Its local check, focused tests, full Node suite, and Vitest suite pass as recorded in the PR body. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
The Web configuration work tracked by #348 can list currently available models, but cannot explain which Pi providers exist, which authentication methods they support, or whether Pi currently considers them configured. Credential material must not cross the Web protocol boundary.
Value
Users and support tooling get actionable provider availability without exposing API keys, OAuth tokens, configured command values, or credential labels.
Approach
This is distinct from #367 runtime diagnostics and #375 thinking-state inspection. Login/logout writes and UI remain follow-ups.
Validation
Impact
Related to #348.