Skip to content

NO-ISSUE: tidy up tools/go.mod - #617

Open
simonpasquier wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
simonpasquier:go-mod-tidy-tools
Open

simonpasquier wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
simonpasquier:go-mod-tidy-tools

Conversation

@simonpasquier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: simonpasquier

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 16, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: e350bc80-8bf5-4c30-8f50-ee71ff3d15e3

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 27accd1 and 977e5d7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Makefile

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 12 included reviews per hour; 10 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Makefile adds a tidy target that runs go mod tidy and go mod verify in the root module and tools. The vendor target now depends on tidy and runs go mod vendor.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~5 minutes

Change: Other

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 977e5

The Makefile maintenance targets introduce no established merge-blocking risk.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 11

❌ Failed checks (11 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided, so the change intent and implementation details cannot be confirmed from the description. Add a brief description of the new tidy target and the updated vendor target behavior.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ❓ Inconclusive Repository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access. Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
Test Structure And Quality ❓ Inconclusive Repository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access. Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
Microshift Test Compatibility ❓ Inconclusive Repository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access. Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ❓ Inconclusive Repository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access. Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ❓ Inconclusive Repository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access. Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ❓ Inconclusive Repository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access. Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ❓ Inconclusive Repository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access. Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
No-Weak-Crypto ❓ Inconclusive Repository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access. Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
Container-Privileges ❓ Inconclusive Repository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access. Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ❓ Inconclusive Repository clone failed, so this custom check could not run with code access. Retry the review run. If this persists, inspect pre-merge custom-check logs for infrastructure or agent runtime failures.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly describes the main change: tidying the tools Go module. It is concise and related to the Makefile updates.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Warning

Git: CodeRabbit could not clone the repository, so clone-backed analysis was skipped and this review may be incomplete. Verify repository clone access, such as SSH credentials, before requesting another full review. If clone access is intentionally unavailable, use path_filters to narrow the review scope.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1


ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: ed703ae5-d92a-4cb6-9f99-112007fd92da

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a47a32b and 27accd1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Makefile

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 12 included reviews per hour; 11 remain after this review.

Comment thread Makefile
##############

vendor:
tidy:

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

Declare tidy as a phony target.

If a file or directory named tidy exists, make can skip these module maintenance commands. This also lets make vendor run with stale root or tools module metadata.

Proposed fix
+ .PHONY: tidy
  tidy:
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
tidy:
.PHONY: tidy
tidy:

Signed-off-by: Simon Pasquier <spasquie@redhat.com>
@simonpasquier simonpasquier changed the title Go mod tidy tools NO-ISSUE: tidy up tools/go.mod Sep 16, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 16, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@simonpasquier: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@simonpasquier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/cc @jan--f
/cc @philipgough

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@simonpasquier: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 20, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants