Skip to content

content: publish legal docs overhaul to production (tos-v1)#2425

Merged
0xkkonrad merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
content/publish-to-main-202607151650
Jul 15, 2026
Merged

content: publish legal docs overhaul to production (tos-v1)#2425
0xkkonrad merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
content/publish-to-main-202607151650

Conversation

@0xkkonrad

@0xkkonrad 0xkkonrad commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What ships

Bumps src/content to peanut-content latest. One signed commit, one file. The delta going live is the tos-v1 legal overhaul (mono 2e24455 + link-style fix 83166e9):

  • New Terms of Service (/en/terms) — full rewrite: Squirrel Labs Ltd (company no. 14558823), self-custody framing with the card-collateral carve-out, all providers named, Points/Rewards split with the 3-month pending-reward expiry, E&W law, GBP 100 cap. Effective 2026-07-15.
  • New Privacy Policy (/en/privacy) — replaces the 2022 Notion-era template (wrong entity, DAO audience). UK GDPR framing, full processor table, honest analytics disclosure.
  • Card terms fixes (/en/card-terms-us, /en/card-terms-international) — 17 surgical edits: typos, a dropped "NEITHER" that inverted the US class-action waiver, the dangling "Section 12.3" reference, privacy-link repoint. Review sheet: mono/inbox/tos-v1/drafts/a3-CHANGES.md.

Decision log: mono/inbox/tos-v1/drafts/RULINGS.md. All docs passed a 3-agent review sweep before landing on mono main. Aleksandar's card-contact hotfix (#2423) is already live and included in this pointer.

Supersedes #2420 (pointer moved under it) and #2424 (format check correctly rejected locale-prefixed internal links; fixed in mono 83166e9).

Note: eslint is red on pre-existing app-source issues unrelated to this bump — it is not part of the required ci-success set.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…3a05f7)

Bumps src/content on production (main) from 32f5b91 → e3a05f7
(peanut-content latest = mono@83166e9). Single-file submodule
pointer change. Publishes content already merged + mirrored from mono that the
dev-targeted auto-PRs never promote to main.
@0xkkonrad 0xkkonrad enabled auto-merge July 15, 2026 16:50
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
peanut-wallet Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 15, 2026 4:56pm

Request Review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@0xkkonrad, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 47 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: d633fac9-8eb9-4666-9413-66ed14b27d96

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7258f72 and d64a2a4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/content

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@0xkkonrad 0xkkonrad changed the title content: publish latest to production (src/content → peanut-content@e3a05f7) content: publish legal docs overhaul to production (tos-v1) Jul 15, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Code-analysis diff

Painscore total: 6122.01 → 6122.01 (0)
Findings: 0 net (+0 new, -0 resolved)

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 UI test report — ✅ all green

Suites

  • unit: 1836 ran, 0 failed, 0 skipped, 29.6s

📊 Coverage (unit)

metric %
statements 58.2%
branches 42.2%
functions 47.0%
lines 58.3%
⏱ 10 slowest test cases
time test
3.7s src/components/Card/share-asset/__tests__/shareAssetLayout.test.ts › never places two stickers in heavy overlap (broad seed sweep)
0.5s src/components/Card/share-asset/__tests__/shareAssetLayout.test.ts › every sticker stays within canvas at any count
0.4s src/app/actions/__tests__/api-headers-extended.test.ts › should not include apiKey in updateUserById body
0.3s src/components/Card/share-asset/__tests__/shareAssetLayout.test.ts › keeps stickers off the username pill (final pass respects the keep-out)
0.3s src/app/actions/__tests__/api-headers.test.ts › should include Content-Type in updateUserById
0.1s src/components/Global/GeneralRecipientInput/__tests__/GeneralRecipientInput.test.tsx › should handle valid 9-digit US account
0.1s src/components/Global/GeneralRecipientInput/__tests__/GeneralRecipientInput.test.tsx › should handle valid ETH address
0.1s src/components/Global/GeneralRecipientInput/__tests__/GeneralRecipientInput.test.tsx › should handle invalid ETH address (too short)
0.1s src/components/Global/GeneralRecipientInput/__tests__/GeneralRecipientInput.test.tsx › should handle valid Italian IBAN
0.1s src/components/Global/GeneralRecipientInput/__tests__/GeneralRecipientInput.test.tsx › should handle valid ENS name
📍 Inline annotations are in the **Unit test report** check above. Coverage artifact: `coverage-unit`. Generated by `.github/workflows/tests.yml`.

@0xkkonrad 0xkkonrad merged commit 3115088 into main Jul 15, 2026
21 of 24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants