Repository navigation
Document benchmark harness status and port plan - #12
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The surviving pre-rebuild benchmark harness measures pipeline fidelity against mocked model output, not detection ability, and has no peer runs; record both caveats and the port plan so the numbers are not mistaken for publishable review-quality results.
|
Postil could not validate the model output. Postil status: needs-attention | errors=1 warnings=0 info=0 inline_comments=1 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Records where the pre-rebuild benchmark harness survives, why its 29/30 result measures pipeline fidelity rather than detection ability (mocked model output derived from the ground-truth spec, no competitor runs), and the port plan toward a live-model mode with peer runs before any published comparison.