Repository navigation
Reconcile review findings by publication identity - #198
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Repeated lifecycle identities can invalidate a completed review's publication receipt. Reconcile active, resolved, and suppressed occurrences before deriving summaries, counts, and gate verdicts, preserving intact blocking evidence and terminal receipt states.
Validation passes formatting, clippy with warnings denied, 822 library tests, 233 end-to-end tests, four installer tests, and focused lifecycle tests without default features. The actual CLI regression covers duplicate baseline adjudication and duplicate active findings through mocked GitHub publication, preserving the blocker with matching envelope and receipt identities.