MCA: dense-core owner substrate and reserve repricing (post-#1168) - #1169
Open
AllenGrahamHart wants to merge 38 commits into
Open
MCA: dense-core owner substrate and reserve repricing (post-#1168)#1169AllenGrahamHart wants to merge 38 commits into
AllenGrahamHart wants to merge 38 commits into
Conversation
This was referenced Aug 14, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack and review boundary
Stacked on exact #1168 head
6a5dcdae1591fc7f044eda6a942bfe178521a48c(itself on #1167/#1166/#1165). Review only:What this supplies
Four guarded inputs for the owner route that #1168 leaves open (a chronology-correct owner for dense parallel pair cores). It does not construct that owner; its purpose is to make the next theorem type-correct and honestly priced before any dense pair-core group is charged to the S/A/E chronology.
2w = 134944KoalaBear /134896Mersenne-31 vs the reserved 31). Any owner reusing the large rational-owner assembly must meetB_owner^(2w)(g) <= B*-(2w+31)-(n-g), the four charges closing toB*identically; exact endpoint tables for both rows (targets274980728110346481..274980728111260112and15728609..16642288). Arithmetic viability only — the stricter large-owner maximum-fiber theorem is explicitly not claimed.k -> k+1transport is false. On the deployed domain,(u,v)=(1_E, X^k)at slope zero is support-wise MCA-bad forRS[F,D,k]and simultaneously explained forRS[F,D,k+1]: badness and first-owner semantics are not dimension-invariant. Shipped as a hostile regression.<kexplanations on the identical support, plus an executable same-support pair-noncontainment test.d1 = 67473(both shifts), passing the guard and reconstructing its support and explanation, with Q, BC, andU_newretained asUNASSIGNED.Acceptance contract (the bridge to #1168 §6)
Any S/A/E chronology owner for the forced
delta <= 4,200632-slope terminal must: meet the repriced target (R1); preserve the actual line/support/slope chronology; pass the degree and pair tests of item 3; accept the typed pole line of item 4; and reject the transport mutation of item 2. This is an interface, not an owner claim.Verification
d1=67473)Scope and nonclaims
Zero deployed ledger movement; rank eleven is not paid; no K3, LIST, or closure claim. #1167's rank-10 payment is noted neutrally: the same theorem was reached independently on the public prize DAG (cycle 232) — convergence, not contest.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ve3d3scwbLSLeo6ByidPxF