Skip to content

Security: pwnapplehat/BitBroom

Security

SECURITY.md

Security policy

Supported versions

The latest release is supported with security fixes.

Threat model highlights

BitBroom deletes files as the invoking user (optionally elevated). The attack surfaces we actively defend:

  • Link following (CWE-552): junctions/symlinks/mount points are refused at scan, wildcard-expansion and delete time; cloud placeholders are refused via attribute checks. This class produced CVE-2025-3025 in a competing product; our regression tests include a junction canary.
  • Path traversal in rules: rules are structural data validated against known bases; .., rooted patterns and env-var surprises are rejected (depth guard).
  • TOCTOU between scan and clean: every deletion re-validates path containment and re-reads attributes immediately before the delete call.
  • Supply chain: the cleaning engine and CLI have zero third-party runtime dependencies. The GUI's single dependency is the MIT-licensed WPF UI library (Fluent controls, pinned version, source-auditable, no network code); test projects use xunit.
  • The only network code in the product is the GUI's optional update check: one HTTPS request to the GitHub releases API at startup (opt-out in Settings), and — only on an explicit "Install update" click — the installer download, which is verified against the release's SHA256SUMS.txt before execution. The engine and CLI make no network requests at all.

Reporting a vulnerability

Please report privately via GitHub Security Advisories ("Report a vulnerability" on the repository) or by email to contact@bitbroom.app, rather than public issues. Expect an acknowledgement within 72 hours. Please include a proof-of-concept path layout if the issue involves the deletion engine.

There aren't any published security advisories