README.md and LICENSE say GPLv2, but all files under src/ which actually get compiled into msm_gbm.so are licensed under the "BSD 3-Clause Clear" license and 0 files actually have a GPL copyright header.
To me it seems that LICENSE should be replaced with the "BSD 3-Clause Clear" text and the mention of GPL should be removed from the README.md.
This also matches better with libgbm itself to which this is an extension, which itself is MIT / BSD licensed.
README.md and LICENSE say GPLv2, but all files under src/ which actually get compiled into msm_gbm.so are licensed under the "BSD 3-Clause Clear" license and 0 files actually have a GPL copyright header.
To me it seems that LICENSE should be replaced with the "BSD 3-Clause Clear" text and the mention of GPL should be removed from the README.md.
This also matches better with libgbm itself to which this is an extension, which itself is MIT / BSD licensed.