Skip to content

Conversation

@bcaton85
Copy link
Contributor

This reverts commit 4ba8e55.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Walkthrough

The Kubernetes NetworkPolicy manifest for the container-security-operator was removed from the bundle. This resource previously defined network access controls for ingress and egress traffic to and from the operator pods.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
NetworkPolicy deletion
bundle/manifests/container-security-operator.networkpolicy.yaml
Removed NetworkPolicy resource that controlled ingress traffic from monitoring namespaces on ports 8081, 443, 6443 and egress traffic for DNS, HTTPS, HTTP, and API server communication.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Verify that the NetworkPolicy removal is intentional and part of a deliberate security/network management change
  • Confirm whether network policies are being managed through alternative mechanisms (e.g., different manifest files, operators, or centralized policy tools)
  • Check if any documentation or deployment procedures reference this removed NetworkPolicy
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6340610 and 6286c0a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • bundle/manifests/container-security-operator.networkpolicy.yaml (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • bundle/manifests/container-security-operator.networkpolicy.yaml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@bcaton85
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick redhat-3.16

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bcaton85: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of redhat-3.16 in a new PR and assign it to you.

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick redhat-3.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@bcaton85 bcaton85 merged commit d82a6eb into quay:master Dec 10, 2025
4 checks passed
@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bcaton85: new pull request created: #158

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick redhat-3.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants