[backport release-1.10]: chore: update rag image to upstream 1.10 build (#29)#32
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Jordan Dubrick <jdubrick@redhat.com>
Code Review by Qodo
1. Misleading README reference
|
PR Summary by QodoBackport: bump rag-content image and RHDH docs vector store to 1.10 WalkthroughsDescription• Update rag-content container image reference to the upstream 1.10 build. • Point RAG SQLite/FAISS storage path at the 1.10 RHDH product docs index. • Refresh vector_store_id to match the updated 1.10 rag-content dataset. Diagramgraph TD
A["env/default-values.env"] --> B(["rag-content image: release-1.10"])
C["images.yaml"] --> B
D["llama-stack-configs/config.yaml"] --> E[("FAISS DB: rhdh docs 1.10")]
D --> F(["vector_store_id updated"])
subgraph Legend
direction LR
_file["Config file"] ~~~ _img(["Container image"]) ~~~ _db[("Database path")]
end
High-Level AssessmentThe following are alternative approaches to this PR: 1. Single source of truth for rag-content image/tag
Recommendation: For this backport, the current approach (explicitly updating both config locations plus the Llama Stack pointers) is appropriate and minimizes behavioral surprises. Consider a follow-up to consolidate image pinning into a single source of truth to prevent mismatched rag-content versions across deployment entrypoints. File ChangesOther (3)
|
What does this PR do?:
Cherry picks #29 as
1.10.1is cutWhich issue(s) this PR fixes:
PR acceptance criteria:
Testing and documentation do not need to be complete in order for this PR to be approved. We just need to ensure tracking issues are opened and linked to this PR, if they are not in the PR scope due to various constraints.
Tested and Verified
Documentation (READMEs, Product Docs, Blogs, Education Modules, etc.)
How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer: