Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sugarscape Model Implementation
Description
This PR introduces a complete implementation of the classic Sugarscape model, designed to serve as a robust testbed for evaluating and comparing different agent cognitive strategies in a resource-scarce environment.
The primary goal of this simulation is to quantitatively measure the survival advantage of learning-based agents over simpler heuristic and random strategies. The experiment has been designed as a rigorous A/B/C/D test with statistical analysis to validate the effectiveness of our Q-learning architecture.
This work is extensively documented in the new blog post, which covers the experimental design, statistical analysis, and a full interpretation of the results.
Key Changes
simulations/sugarscape_simmodule, including all necessary components, systems, actions, and providers.validate_sim.yml) that defines the four-group study comparing heuristic, random, and two Q-learning agent architectures.analyze_sugarscape.py) that uses ANOVA and Tukey's HSD to rigorously evaluate the experimental results.How to Test & Run
docker compose exec app poetry run python simulations/sugarscape_sim/analysis/analyze_sugarscape.py