Skip to content

Added missing healthcheck port exposure command#687

Open
thatcherhubbard wants to merge 2 commits intorh-mobb:mainfrom
thatcherhubbard:bug/rosa-nlb-cf-vpco
Open

Added missing healthcheck port exposure command#687
thatcherhubbard wants to merge 2 commits intorh-mobb:mainfrom
thatcherhubbard:bug/rosa-nlb-cf-vpco

Conversation

@thatcherhubbard
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The procedure was missing the command to make it possible to reach the IngressController healthcheck port from outside the cluster by adding it to the Service.

@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify Bot commented Mar 5, 2026

Deploy Preview for rh-cloud-experts ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 353231c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/rh-cloud-experts/deploys/69aa03d7afff750008d23b2f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-687--rh-cloud-experts.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@diana-sari diana-sari left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah good catch thanks very much for flagging this!:)

i think the health check port exposure is already covered in the create-private-ingress-controller referenced in Step 2, so rather than repeating the full patch command here, should we may be just tighten Step 2 to explicitly call out to complete the inner NLB setup through the service patch and health-check exposure before continuing?

So for Step 2, we can do something like this for example, what do you think?

Follow the Private Ingress Controller with ALB guide to create the private IngressController and inner NLB.

Complete that guide through the point where:

  • the IngressController service has been patched to expose the router health check port (1936)
  • the inner NLB is healthy
  • you have retrieved the private IP addresses of the inner NLB targets

You will use those IPs in the next step when creating the outer target group/NLB for CloudFront.

@diana-sari
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Btw, i tried pushing the fix directly but don't have the permission to update your fork, so i opened a follow-up PR against your branch thatcherhubbard#1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants