Skip to content

chore: relicense project to MIT and update documentation links - #10

Merged
buivietphi merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/mti-ridelinktechs-followup
Jul 2, 2026
Merged

buivietphi merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/mti-ridelinktechs-followup

Conversation

@buivietphi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Related Issue

Type of Change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Refactor / code improvement
  • Documentation update
  • Performance improvement
  • CI/CD or build configuration
  • Other (describe below)

Testing

  • Tested on macOS
  • Tested on Windows
  • Flutter analyze passes
  • SDK build passes (if applicable)

Screenshots (if applicable)

@buivietphi
buivietphi merged commit ef7412d into main Jul 2, 2026
1 of 5 checks passed
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@buivietphi, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 9 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 2a1266c6-fd5b-4e95-a960-31e264b946af

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3fc08ec and 5efd102.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • LICENSE is excluded by none and included by none
  • README.md is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • client_sdks/devconnect-android/LICENSE
  • client_sdks/devconnect-react-native/LICENSE
  • client_sdks/devconnect_flutter/LICENSE
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/mti-ridelinktechs-followup

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the license of the repository and its client SDKs to the MIT License, fixes repository URLs in the documentation, and reformats several markdown tables and code snippets in the README. The review feedback points out two configuration issues in the README: an incorrect JitPack dependency coordinate for the Android SDK and an outdated folder path for the Flutter SDK dependency.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

Comment thread README.md
// app/build.gradle.kts
dependencies {
implementation("com.github.MTI ridelinktechs.devconnect:devconnect-manage-android:v1.0.0")
implementation("com.github.ridelinktechs.devconnect:devconnect-manage-android:v1.0.0")

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The JitPack dependency coordinate is incorrect. Since the repository name is devconnect-manage-kit and the Android module folder is located at client_sdks/devconnect-android, the correct JitPack coordinate format for a multi-module repository is com.github.Username.RepositoryName:ModuleName:Version.

Please update the coordinate to use devconnect-manage-kit as the repository name and devconnect-android as the module name.

Suggested change
implementation("com.github.ridelinktechs.devconnect:devconnect-manage-android:v1.0.0")
implementation("com.github.ridelinktechs.devconnect-manage-kit:devconnect-android:v1.0.0")

Comment thread README.md
devconnect_manage_kit:
git:
url: https://github.com/MTI ridelinktechs/devconnect-manage-kit.git
url: https://github.com/ridelinktechs/devconnect-manage-kit.git

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While updating the repository URL, please note that the path on the next line (client_sdks/devconnect_manage_kit) does not match the actual folder name in the repository, which is client_sdks/devconnect_flutter.

Please update the path to client_sdks/devconnect_flutter to ensure the dependency can be resolved correctly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant