feat: add retrieval filtering examples#19
Merged
Conversation
Clarify example requirements and self-review process.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds generic Python and TypeScript retrieval-filtering examples.
The examples demonstrate that Context Compiler authoritative state determines which documents are eligible for retrieval. The host owns retrieval, while Context Compiler owns the policy state that constrains retrieval access.
Why
Retrieval filtering is a distinct enforcement point.
These examples show that protected documents are filtered before retrieval results are returned. Access decisions are enforced by host-side filtering based on authoritative Context Compiler state, not by prompt instructions or model compliance.
The examples use an HR policy lookup domain with audience-restricted documents to demonstrate observable retrieval behavior changes as authoritative state changes.
Example metadata
Checklist
Notes
Both implementations demonstrate:
The examples intentionally perform filtering before documents are returned. This demonstrates retrieval filtering as a host-side enforcement point rather than a post-generation redaction strategy.
TypeScript validation scripts were updated so the new example participates in repository validation.