Repository navigation
review: the Claude review calls babel on epyc with the key ci, so it reads no setup token - #60
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…y ci, so babel picks the account The copy stays, because this repo is public and cannot call a workflow or an action of the private rubas/ci. It now reads BABEL_KEY and BABEL_POOL_SENTINEL from r-ci-repo prod:/babel, as rubas/ci#130 does, and no longer reads prod:/claude-review. One review step replaces the three account attempts and the step that failed the job after them. The action moves to v1.0.248 and uses the CLI and the Bun of the runner image.
…p the classifier, which would send the babel key to Anthropic
… ended the turn on claude-opus-5 before any request
…0.14.3 wreq-util 0.2.0 needs zstd ^0.13.3, so cargo update cannot reach the fixed versions. Its calls reach none of the affected functions.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before. The Claude review reads the setup tokens in Infisical
r-ci-repoprod:/claude-reviewand tries up to three accounts. One of them,CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN_2, gets:Problem. The three
<owner>/cirepos moved their reviews to babel on epyc today (rubas/ci#130), so this workflow is the last reader ofprod:/claude-review, and those logins are due to go. kagi is public and rubas/ci is private, so kagi cannot call the shared review and keeps its own copy.After. One
Claude reviewstep callshttp://epyc.rubas.dev:8787with the babel keyciand the pool sentinel fromprod:/babel, set up as in rubas/ci#130, and babel picks the account. The action moves from v1.0.231 to v1.0.248, the pin of rubas/ci.Details
classify_inline_commentsis off. In v1.0.248,post-buffered-inline-comments.tssendsANTHROPIC_API_KEYstraight tohttps://api.anthropic.com/v1/messagesand ignoresANTHROPIC_BASE_URL, so the classifier would send the babel key to Anthropic. Every inline comment now posts at once, as before the buffering.The prompt step is gone: it existed so that three attempts could share one prompt.
.github/actionlint.yamlnames the runner labelincus, as in rubas/ci.The identity
ci-reviewin rubas/opsinfisical/review.tfkeepsrubas/kagi/.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml@*, because a PR run's ref isrefs/pull/<n>/merge. This PR's own review run is the test.