Update cargo

[dtolnay]

9 commits in 9765a449d9b7341c2b49b88da41c2268ea599720..71cd3a926f0cf41eeaf9f2a7f2194b2aff85b0f6
2023-11-17 20:58:23 +0000 to 2023-11-20 15:30:57 +0000

• Handle $message_type in JSON diagnostics (Handle $message_type in JSON diagnostics cargo#13016)
• refactor(toml): Further clean up inheritance (refactor(toml): Further clean up inheritance cargo#13000)
• Fix --check-cfg invocations with zero features (Fix --check-cfg invocations with zero features cargo#13011)
• chore: bump cargo-credential-* crates as e58b84d broke stuff (chore: bump cargo-credential-* crates as e58b84d broke stuff cargo#13010)
• contrib docs: Update now that credential crates are published. (contrib docs: Update now that credential crates are published. cargo#13006)
• Add more resources to the contrib docs. (Add more resources to the contrib docs. cargo#13008)
• Respect rust-lang/rust's omit-git-hash (Respect rust-lang/rust's omit-git-hash cargo#12968)
• Fix clippy-wrapper test race condition. (Fix clippy-wrapper test race condition. cargo#12999)
• fix(resolver): Don't do git fetches when updating workspace members (fix(resolver): Don't do git fetches when updating workspace members cargo#12975)

[rustbot]

r? @ehuss

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[rustbot]

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

• These commits modify submodules.

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred in src/tools/cargo

cc @ehuss

[dtolnay]

The reason for the off-schedule update is to pull in rust-lang/cargo#13016 to unblock #115691.

[weihanglo]

No problem. Looks good to me. Thank you :)

@bors r+ p=1 rollup=never

[bors]

📌 Commit 63171a7 has been approved by weihanglo

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 63171a7 with merge 3a85a5c...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: weihanglo
Pushing 3a85a5c to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (3a85a5c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.0%	[-1.0%, -1.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.0%	[-1.0%, -1.0%]	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.8%	[4.8%, 4.8%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.2%	[-3.2%, -3.2%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.6%	[-1.6%, -1.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.4%	[-2.8%, -2.1%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.6%	[-1.6%, -1.6%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 677.019s -> 677.57s (0.08%)
Artifact size: 313.78 MiB -> 313.75 MiB (-0.01%)